Hi All, NG Vinny.
- Written in response to NG Vinny post from 12-Jun, for some reason I
could not add it to the thread. :-(
The problem lies in versions. The published code for SynonymsQuery was
originally written on Lucene 1.4.3. It did not compile as is with Lucene 2.0.
The required c
Hi Wouter,
My thought would be to go for plan (b) (have not tested it though). This
would produce simply the sum of frequencies of the different terms (I'm
referring to a real multi-term query, not a phrase as you mentioned -
"the man" - which should work).
The problem I see is that it you loose
nable/disable the option of using synonyms (e.g. some applications has an
"exact match" feature, or the client simply doesn't want to drift from "car" to
"auto").
BTW, for reply please use ziv.gome_gmail_com (replace "_" where appropriate)
Thanx,
Ziv G
).
Full details can be found at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/200603.mbox/%3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, for reply please use ziv.gome_gmail_com (replace "_" where
appropriate)
Ziv Gome
-Original Message-
From: Dragon Fly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
tructed only for the case where
you wish to "count as one term", which I believe is not the case for the
fuzzy situation.
Thanx for your time,
Ziv Gome
-Original Message-
From: mark harwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 5:22 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apach
ermQuery, where the
adjustment is basically the IDF ratios:
IDF-main-field(term)/IDF-secondary-field(term). This way the
summation/max (however you wish to accumulate the term over different
fields) is performed on equivalent-basis scores.
Thank you for reading all this...
Ziv Gome.
-Original Mess
