gest an approach.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Dec 27, 2007 8:59 AM, Zhou Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I encounter a strange probelm. To improve performance, I open the
> > indexreader at the start time and reuse it in later search.
Hi all,
I encounter a strange probelm. To improve performance, I open the
indexreader at the start time and reuse it in later search. I have another
process running to do online indexing. The search service and indexing
service is accessing the same index folder. But I found out the search
servi
Hi Grant,
The exception is throw from java native method."Failed to merge indexes,
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space ". ( I have set the -Xmx1024m in
JVM.)
I guess it is similar as the problem appeared in previous thread before (
http://www.nabble.com/Index-merge-and-java-heap-space-tt50
Using the search function for pagination will carry out unnecessary index
search when you are going previous or next. Generally, most of the
information need (e.g 80%) can be satisfied by the first 100 documents
(20%). In lucene, the returing documents is set to 100 for the sake of
speed.
I am not
Hi , Grant
After I adjust the mergefactor of indexwriter from 1000 to 100, it worked.
Thank you.
22 Dec 2007 07:05:05 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> AUTOMATIC REPLY
>
> LUX is closed until 7th January 2008
>
> most information about LUX is available at www.lux.org.uk
>
>
>
>
Hi guys,
I met some trouble in optimizing the index. The index looks fine in Luke
and I can carry out the search in the index. However, when I try to merge
all these seperated files into a complete index. A java internal exception
indicates that the file are too large.The index size is about 40G
Hi Sumittyagi,
I think you can implement your factors in the scorer to obtain your
desired results.
2007/12/21, mark harwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I think you need to describe your "factors" in more detail. Exactly what
> do you want to achieve for your users?
> We could be talking about
Brain,
Can you simply describe the method you tried? I am very intertested in
that.
Jackson
2007/12/20, Brian Grimal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I would love to revisit this one. I implemented pseudo date boosting in
> an overly simplistic manner in my app, which I know can be improved
> upon.
It works. John and Michael Thank you very much.
Best Regards,
Zhou Qi
Dept. Computer Science & Engineering
Shanghai Jiaotong University
-邮件原件-
发件人: Michael Busch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
发送时间: 2007年11月16日 2:34
收件人: java-user@lucene.apache.org
主题: Re: 答复: how to effecie
score (stored in the index) to sum the overall score. It is
inefficient. How to improve that by a new approach?
Sorry for making you misunderstanding. Thanks
Best Regards,
Zhou Qi
Dept. Computer Science & Engineering
Shanghai Jiaotong University
-邮件原件-
发件人: Chee Wu [mailto:[E
.
Best Regards,
Zhou Qi
Dept. Computer Science & Engineering
Shanghai Jiaotong University
11 matches
Mail list logo