Re: StandardTokenizerImpl generation question

2015-04-25 Thread Youngho Cho
you may be open an issue to update the documentation in the files? >> >> Uwe >> >> - >> Uwe Schindler >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> > -Original Message- >&

StandardTokenizerImpl generation question

2015-04-24 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello, I would like to generate my own tokenizer which is slightly modify the StandardTokenizerImpl*.jflex. But I read the READ_BEFORE_GENERATING.txt. Currently, the jflex version is 1.6.1. but the document recommend to use jflex 1.5 only. Still this message is valid and do I have to generate a

Re: RangeQuery, FilterdQuery and HitCollector

2006-03-09 Thread Youngho Cho
lasted trunk codebase. I have recently applied a contributed > patch to FilteredQuery. Using the latest codebase, your test passes > for me. > > Erik > > > On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Youngho Cho wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to use a Filter

RangeQuery, FilterdQuery and HitCollector

2006-03-08 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello, I would like to use a Filter for rangeQuery ( to avoid potential TooManyClauses exception ) and found out http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/FilteringOptions wiki said that FilteredQuery is best one. But Interesting is that when I used the option with HitCollector , FilteredQuery te

Re: BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses with 1.9.1 when Number RangeQuery

2006-03-07 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello, > > > > : I upgade to 1.9.1 and reindexing > > : I used NumberTool when I index the number. > > : > > : after upgrade I got following error when number range query. > > : with query > > > > The possibility of a TooManyClauses exception has always existed with > > RangeQuery and numbers, e

Re: BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses with 1.9.1 when Number RangeQuery

2006-03-07 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello - Original Message - From: "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lucene Users" Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 3:49 PM Subject: Re: BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses with 1.9.1 when Number RangeQuery > > : I upgade to 1.9.1 and reindexing > : I used NumberTool when I index the numb

BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses with 1.9.1 when Number RangeQuery

2006-03-06 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello I upgade to 1.9.1 and reindexing I used NumberTool when I index the number. after upgrade I got following error when number range query. with query 2006-03-07 09:08:03,216 [TP-Processor3] DEBUG com.nannet.jettiger.util.word.JetTigerAdapter - Queryafter=+prntid:56 +(+(+attid:113 +[0

Re: Getting Started with Korean

2005-11-11 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello, - Original Message - From: "Grant Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 10:36 PM Subject: Getting Started with Korean > Hi, > > Was wondering if someone could help me out with a few things in Korean > as related to Lucene: > 1. Which Analyzer do y

Re: korean and lucene

2005-11-08 Thread Youngho Cho
- Original Message - From: "Cheolgoo Kang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Youngho Cho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:53 PM Subject: Re: korean and lucene > On 11/8/05, Youngho Cho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > &g

Re: korean and lucene

2005-11-08 Thread Youngho Cho
than good match. I think there is some tradeoff here. Maybe need some good stop filter for korean etc... Thanks Youngho ----- Original Message - From: "Youngho Cho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 4:44 PM Subject: Re: korean and lu

Re: korean and lucene

2005-11-07 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello Cheolgoo, I will test the patch. Thanks, Youngho - Original Message - From: "Cheolgoo Kang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; "Youngho Cho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 4:06 PM Subject: Re: korean and lucene > Hello, >

Re: Lucene in Action in Korean

2005-11-07 Thread Youngho Cho
Congratulation ! Youngho - Original Message - From: "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 2:02 PM Subject: Lucene in Action in Korean > Hello, > > If there are any Koreans (or others dying to read a book about Lucene > in Korean), there is no

Re: korean and lucene

2005-10-26 Thread Youngho Cho
anese Test... Korean Test... Thanks, Youngho - Original Message - From: "Youngho Cho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; "Youngho Cho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 12:47 PM Subject: Re: korean and lucene > Hello all

Re: korean and lucene

2005-10-26 Thread Youngho Cho
thanks Koji and Cheolgoo I will further test now... Youngho - Original Message - From: "Youngho Cho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 12:28 PM Subject: Re: korean and lucene > Hello Koji > > Here is test result. > Japanese

Re: korean and lucene

2005-10-26 Thread Youngho Cho
iguchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; "Youngho Cho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:47 AM Subject: RE: korean and lucene > Hello Youngho, > > I don't understand why you couldn't get hits result in Japanese, > though, you had better c

Re: korean and lucene

2005-10-26 Thread Youngho Cho
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; "Youngho Cho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 9:48 AM Subject: RE: korean and lucene > Hi Youngho, > > With regard to Japanese, using StandardAnalyzer, > I can search a word/phase. > > Did you use QueryParser?

Re: korean and lucene

2005-10-26 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello Cheolgoo, Now I updated my lucene version to 1.9 for using StandardAnalyzer for Korean. And tested your patch which is already adopted in 1.9 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-444 But Still I have no good results with Korean compare with CJKAnalyzer. Single character is good ma

Re: korean and lucene

2005-10-03 Thread Youngho Cho
Would you share what the problem is ? I used CJKAnalyzer for Korean over 2 years without any problem. ( I remembered that there was some query result problem with StandardAnalyzer at that time ) But I tring to switch to the StandardAnalyzer again. Thanks, Youngho - Original Message -

HitCollector with RemoteSearchable

2005-09-15 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello, Can I use HitCollector with RemoteSearchable ? I am tring to use it. But I got the following error. java.rmi.MarshalException: error marshalling arguments; nested exception is: java.io.NotSerializableException: org.apache.lucene.search.MultiSearcher$1 at sun.rmi.server.U

Re: RAMDirectory add index with other machine FSDirectory

2005-09-09 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello Otis, Thanks alot !. I will try. Thanks again, Youngho - Original Message - From: "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; "Youngho Cho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:59 AM Subject: Re: RAMDirectory add inde

RAMDirectory add index with other machine FSDirectory

2005-09-09 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello, I would like to add RAMDirectory to another machines' FSDirectory Is there any good way ? Thanks, Youngho

Re: RAMDirectory and Serializable

2005-09-09 Thread Youngho Cho
Hi Otis, Thanks for your reply. Youngho. - Original Message - From: "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; "Youngho Cho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 12:33 AM Subject: Re: RAMDirectory and Serializable > Hi Yo

RAMDirectory and Serializable

2005-09-09 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello, I would like to add RAMDirectory to another machines' FSDirectory Can I treat a RAMDirectory as Serializable ? I found RAMDirectory and Serializable discussion a long time ago in the dev list. But I cound find the answer. Thanks. Youngho

Strange Error Problem

2005-06-20 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello, I develop our system using lucene 1.4.3 with RemoteSearchable. Currently I got the following error message. But I don't konw why it happend and how to fix it. Could you explain what situation give the following error ??? Thanks. Youngho java.io.IOException: read past EOF at org