You would have to if you would e.g. still have had a Lucene50 Codec index
in use, even with 6.1.0.
This is not new that there is the backwards compatible jar which you need
to add if you want to use old codecs.
https://lucene.apache.org/core/6_2_0/backward-codecs/overview-summary.html
Just do what the error message tells you to do ...
Baris Kazar schrieb am Sa., 28. Juli 2018, 22:41:
> is there a packaging issue but i also checked next Lucene versions and
> they have the same structure ie no Lucene60 codec classes.
> Best regards
>
> - Original Message -
> From: baris
What does lsof tell - which handles are open and which are unexpected or
suspicious?
Am 22.02.2017 5:27 nachm. schrieb "Leonid Bolshinsky" :
> No code changes between running in Java 6 and Java 8. The same code still
> runs successfully with Java 6 while is failing with Java 8.
>
> On Feb 22, 201
DocValuesRangeFilter moved to the sandbox, see here:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/5_5_0/sandbox/org/apache/lucene/search/DocValuesRangeFilter.html
At least you could use it while migrating but as its deprecated and
experimental you still would need to migrate it again when its changed.
Cheers
Thanks for going to fix the stale docs.
Torsten
Am Montag, den 25.04.2016, 11:09 -0400 schrieb Michael McCandless:
> The Lucene level javadocs are definitely stale ... I'll fix.
>
>
> You should separately add a SortedDocValuesField if you also need to
> sort on this field.
>
> Mike McCandless
Hi Erick,
i guess you've muddled the lists - this is lucenes one, not solr. I know
how to define it in solr but that wasn't the question as i am using pure
lucene and it did not work as expected from the javadocs there.
Cheers
Torsten
--
ype.SORTED. Is there
> any other way to do that without creating a custom Field?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Torsten Krah
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looking at the JavaDoc of StringField it says:
>
> /** A field that is indexed
Hi,
you've already asked something similar in January about index corruption
and Uwe Schindler already told you to switch to a modern JVM and not
that antique one.
See:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/296418?page=last
Quote from him:
...
This Java version is "antique".
Hi,
looking at the JavaDoc of StringField it says:
/** A field that is indexed but not tokenized: the entire
* String value is indexed as a single token. For example
* this might be used for a 'country' field or an 'id'
* field, or any field that you intend to use for sorting
* or access
Hi,
looking at the JavaDoc of StringField it says:
/** A field that is indexed but not tokenized: the entire
* String value is indexed as a single token. For example
* this might be used for a 'country' field or an 'id'
* field, or any field that you intend to use for sorting
* or access
Hi,
looking at the Changes.html or Migrate.html there is only mentioned that
the FieldCache is gone.
However there was also a FieldCacheRangeFilter in 4.10.x - guess its
gone too?
For the missing ChainedFilter a BooleanFilter can be used.
Which one should be used for the FieldCacheRangeFilter?
k
Hi,
reading the release notes from here:
https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote50
its written that Lucene got a new DateRangeField:
* New DateRangeField type enables Indexing and searching of date ranges,
particularly multi-valued ones.
However - in which package is this field? Search
I you really want a per session based reader, use a
http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/5/api/javax/servlet/http/HttpSessionListener.html
and create the object there in sessionCreated and destroy the Reader in
sessionDestroyed.
You seam component can get the create objected under a well known name
you'
Maybe related to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3418
Monitor usage via VisualVM and you should find who is using too much cpu
time.
regards
Torsten
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Am Donnerstag, den 26.04.2012, 09:46 +0530 schrieb KARTHIK SHIVAKUMAR:
> Then delete the same and insert the same Fresh Document alone.
But that is not "update" like the question was - that is a complete
reindex of the original document, the original question was, if updating
a field of a doc can
Am Dienstag, den 24.04.2012, 21:57 +0530 schrieb KARTHIK SHIVAKUMAR:
> Simple Techniques is to use "Update Index" for the dynamic data
> colum
>
> rather then re-indexing the whole document.
Just for interest, how do you do that?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
gt; Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Torsten Krah [mailto:tk...@fachschaft.imn.htwk-leipzig.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 12:48 PM
> >
Hi,
i did a checkout of:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_6
and modified some jflex files like done in 3.5.0 (once reachable via
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x) After
that in 3.5.0 running the jflex target and all went fine.
Now in
18 matches
Mail list logo
