Hi!
Doug's suggestion would make me perfectly happy if
that patch were available now(!)..
Thanks,
Tim
--- Steven Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Tim Smith wrote:
> > How can I restore the behavior of the old
> > WildcardQuery under 2.1?
> &g
Hi!
Isn't RegexQuery slower than '???' at the end of a
word?
Thanks,
Tim
--- Daniel Noll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 June 2007 17:48:10 Tim Smith wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > How can I restore the behavior of the old
> > WildcardQue
gt; cat??? to cat*
>
> If that doesn't satisfy your requirements, perhaps
> you could
> post a more detailed explanation of what you're
> trying to
> accomplish.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On 6/6/07, Tim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
Hi!
How can I restore the behavior of the old
WildcardQuery under 2.1?
I badly need 'cat???' to match 'cat' again just like
in the older versions.
I could modify my istance of lucene by removing those
"new" lines, but I don't want to maintain a custom
lucene package.
Please help!
Tim
Source
