Hi,
It seems like current 3.0 branch has accumulated some important bug
fixes, especially the possible index corruption bug. Is there a date for a
formal 3.0.3 release?
-shay.banon
> simon
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Shay Banon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >A user got this very strange exception, and I managed to get the index
> > that it happens on. Basically, iterating over the TermDocs causes an
> AAOIB
> > exception. I easily re
Hi,
A user got this very strange exception, and I managed to get the index
that it happens on. Basically, iterating over the TermDocs causes an AAOIB
exception. I easily reproduced it using the FieldCache which does exactly
that (the field in question is indexed as numeric). Here is the except
but, you may be hitting one of the memory leak
> bugs recently fixed but not yet (though soon to be) released.
>
> Can you try running with the tip of whichever release you are using?
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Shay Banon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> &g
Hi,
I have a question on how IndexWriter manages its memory when it comes to
RawPostingList. Its pretty late, so sorry if the question is obvious, but
the question is when does the RawPostingList array gets reclaimed or
shrinked? I assume they get factored in the ram balancing process, but, is
t
Right, make sense.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Shay Banon wrote:
> > Oh, and one more thing. Deleted docs is a sub case, with NRT, most people
> > will almost always add docs as well... . So it is still not really usabl
Oh, and one more thing. Deleted docs is a sub case, with NRT, most people
will almost always add docs as well... . So it is still not really usable
for field cache, right?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Shay Banon wrote:
> Just saw that you opened a case for that. I think that its import
on
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Shay Banon wrote:
> > Great, so I am not imagining things this late into the night ... ;), not
> so
> > great, since using NRT with field cache (like sorting) or caching
> filters,
>
Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Yep, confirmed what you are seeing. I'll check into it and open an issue.
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Shay Banon wrote:
> > Yea, I noticed that ;). Even so, I
riter.close();
}
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Shay Banon wrote:
> > I wanted to verify if my understanding is correct. Assuming that I use
> > NRT, and refresh, say, every 1 second, caching based on IndexReader, such
Hi,
I wanted to verify if my understanding is correct. Assuming that I use
NRT, and refresh, say, every 1 second, caching based on IndexReader, such is
what is used in the CachingWrapperFilter is basically useless, since, even
if there is an open sub reader, it gets clones meaning there is a ne
Hi,
Just wanted to announce the release of a new open source project called
ElasticSearch (http://www.elasticsearch.com/). Its an open source (Apache
2), distributed, search engine built on top of Lucene. There are many
features for ElasticSearch, you can find them here:
http://www.elasticsearc
x27;re particularly interested feel free
> to
> open a jira issue.
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Shay Banon wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a case where deleting documents by doc id make sense (I know
>> before hand the docs I want to dele
Hi,
I have a case where deleting documents by doc id make sense (I know
before hand the docs I want to delete based on the doc id). I am wondering
why the API is not exposed in the IndexWriter (as it is in IndexReader). I
understand that this API is more "expert" than typical usage, but it all
Since I do not want to invade Lucene user list regarding a discussion about
Compass and Hiberante Search, but I still think that it is something that
needs to get answered, here is a link to my blog post discussing this:
http://jroller.com/page/kimchy?entry=hibernate_search_lucene .
Cheers,
Shay
We are pleased to announce the 0.8.0 release of Compass Framework - A
Java Search Engine Framework based on Lucene.
Major feature of this release is the ability to store Lucene index
within a database. The feature has two parts: A complete Lucene Jdbc
Directory implementation which is separate
have some kind
of knowledge how to combine the two.
Shay
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hi Chris,
--- Chris Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Just an idea to make Lucene work with databases more easily.
When I communicated with Shay Banon(Compass' author), it came to me
that m
Of course, sorry ;-(
http://compass.sourceforge.net
Mark Benussi wrote:
Shay.
Do you have a web site that we can visit to discover more about your
technology?
-Original Message-
From: Shay Banon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 August 2005 22:34
To: java-user
We are please to announce the 0.5 major feature release of Compass
Object/Search Engine Mapping (OSEM) framework. This release makes
integrating search capability with existing development frameworks (like
Hibernate and Spring) even simpler. Compass uses declarative mapping
technology, which me
19 matches
Mail list logo
