; reduced).
>
> Also if you are using filters what has really helped us is to use cached
> filters (CachingWrapperFilters).
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Yannis.
>
> On Oct 6, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Shailendra Mudgal wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Recently we have
Hi Everyone,
Recently we have migrated from lucene 2.2 to lucene 2.9.3.
We are having some issues in search. During the load, searchers are getting
hung up. When we took a process stack, we sound that there are around 450
threads are in the blocked state.
Thread t...@885: (state = BLOCKED)
-
o
che and search will be in synch for that
> interval.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Shailendra Mudgal <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Erik Thanks for you prompt reply.
> >
> > So if i refresh the searcher in every one h
wrote:
> Doc IDs are NOT permanent. If you don't change your index at all
> (delete especially, but sometimes adding/optimizing can chage IDs)
> then you can re-use them. Otherwise not.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Shailendra Mudgal <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi All,
I have a multivalued field in the index. Can i use FieldCache for caching
that field.
Thanks,
Vipin
Hi All,
I have a small confusion regarding the document ids which we collect using
HitCollector.collect() method. Here is the description of the confusion :
First i created a FieldCache of type > using a
query which collects all the articles which are only a month old. I am
storing them into a ma
Hi folks,
I am using a MultiSearcher object which uses 4 months indexes. I have a
requirement for which i need to cache one field for documents which are less
then one month old. So for that i am first creating a date query(for last
one month) and using HitCollector.collect() for collecting Docume
> The bottom line is that reading fields from docs is expensive.
> FieldCache will, I believe, load fields for all documents but only
> once - so the second and subsequent times it will be fast. Even
> without using a cache it is likely that things will speed up because
> of caching by the OS.
A
Hi All,
Thanks for your reply. I would like to mention here is that the companyId is
a multivalued field. I tried paul's suggestions also but doesn't seem much
gain. Still the searcher.doc() method is taking almost the same amount of
time.
> you can use the FieldCache to lookup the compnayId for
Hi Everyone,
We are using Lucene to search on a index of around 20G size with around 3
million documents. We are facing performance issues loading large results
from the index. Based on the various posts on the forum and documentation,
we have made the following code changes to improve the perform
Hi,
If while indexing we have not set this flag, then is there any other way to
get this info, i mean the TermFreqVector for a document ??
On 8/3/07, testn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> you can use IndexReader.getTermFreqVectors(int n) to get all terms and
> their
> frequencies. Make sure whe
Hi All,
I have an index without does not have the termFreqVector stored in it. I do
not want to recreate the index as it is a big index and took a lot of time
while creation. Is their a other way for generating the termFreqVector with
the available info for all the documents.
Any help will be app
Ok let me explain you. By warming up the reader i used to understand is that
it memorizes the index terms. Therefore subsequent queries will be answered
by using these terms. Is this correct ?
On 9/18/07, Karl Wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> 18 sep 2007 kl. 08.33 skrev Sh
Whether it caches frequently used terms ?
On 9/18/07, Karl Wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> 18 sep 2007 kl. 07.12 skrev Shailendra Mudgal:
>
> >
> > What my goal is to understand the caching strategy. How well this
> > work for repetitive queries. Is
Hi Yonik,
Thanks for your response. I'll feel great if you can explain this in more
detail as i am not sure that whether i have understood this correctly or
not. Or if you can direct me to some resource that will also be very good
for me.
What my goal is to understand the caching strategy. How w
Hi All,
One thing that i understand about IndexReader is that for subsequent
queries, results come fast as the IndexReader needs to be warmed up.
According to this, I am trying to find out the answers of following
questions :
- is there any caching is done in lucene for search ?
- if yes, is it fo
16 matches
Mail list logo