rcher? Currently I just check hits.size().
Russ
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-Original Message-
From: "Erick Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:49:45
To:java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: optimizing single document searches
Whi
Thanks, I will try it tommorow... Is it significantly different from using a
standard index on a ramdir?
Russ
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-Original Message-
From: karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:37:55
To:java-user@lucene.apache.org
S
Sorry, didn't mean for this to go to the list...
Russ
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-Original Message-
From: "Russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 13:56:41
To:java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: An arguable bug in Lucene 1.9.1
You're not Gary Lee that went to poly, are you?
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:38:03
To:
Subject: RE: An arguable bug in Lucene 1.9.1
I am seeing this issue as well with the exact same stack trace using
Can you use multiple threads/machines to index the data into separate indexes,
and then combine them?
Russ
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-Original Message-
From: "Alice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:47:36
To:
Subject: Huge Index
Hell
ed in "lucene in action".
Russ
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-Original Message-
From: "Peter W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:02:00
To:java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: lucene scalability questions
Mark,
My understandin
