Is there an entity-relationship of the segment files and/or Berkeley
DB tables (with table definitions)?
I'm trying understand the segment files of Lucene and know that a
Berkeley DB can be used to store the directory but can't locate any ER
diagram or table definitions for the DB.
There is one on Salmon Run that I am using.. it seems to work pretty
well.. add the words "Salmon Run" to your Google search..
-Original Message-
From: shashi@gmail.com [mailto:shashi@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Shashi Kant
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 10:41 AM
To: java-user@lucene
systems deserve a certain amount of respect and justice. They are
stealing and harming the very people that make our projects and the
companies we work for possible.
Is a simple 30 or 40 dollars in recognition for what these guys have
done to much to ask? To do what is right...
Ray
-Original
I can now create indexes with Nutch, and see them in Luke.. this is
fantastic news, well for me it is beyond fantastic..
Now I would like to (need to) query them, and to that end I wrote the
following code segment.
int maxHits = 1000;
NutchBean nutchBean = new N
you all who are saying 2 billion docs
will bring lucene to its knees are wrong...
Ray.
- Original Message -
From: "Erick Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: MultiSearcher to overcome the Integer.MAX_VALUE limit
We
elves ?
Kind regards,
Ray.
i've indexed 80m records and now up to 200m.. it can be done, and could've
been done better. like the other said, architecture is important. have you
considered looking into solr? i haven't kept up with it (and many of the
mailing lists...), but looks very interesting.
ray,
On
I think it ultimately depends on what you would like to do with the
stored data? Would you need more of full text searches on the log or
more of statistical anlaysis?
ray,
On 6/18/06, Andreas Moroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I would like to write a application to browse arou
Hi Erik,
Where did you get that chinese sentence from? That's funny! haha.
ray,
On 6/15/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob,
Your example is, hopefully, not exact since you used "C1..." which I
presume was not what you originally tested with.
CJKAnalyzer i
rs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/ChineseTokenizer.java?rev=353930&view=markup)
"C1C2C3C4" -> "C1" "C2" "C2" "C3" "C3" "C4"
The most obvious result of these 3 tokenization tokenization
strategies is the searc
Zsolt,
It's in the lucene trunk under the contrib/ directory, you can check
it out from the repository, take a look at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/contrib/analyzers/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/
ray,
On 1/29/06, Zsolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A
Hi Zsolt,
you can try to use a Chinese analyzer.
ray,
On 1/28/06, Zsolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We use lucene without any problems even for German text bit with Chinese
> text nothing is found. What is the best way to index and search Chinese
Paul,
Thanks for the advice! But for the 100+queries/sec on a 32-bit
platfrom, did you end up applying other patches? or use different
FSDirectory implementations?
Thanks!
ray,
On 1/27/06, Peter Keegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ray,
>
> The short answer is that you can make L
Peter,
Wow, the speed up in impressive! But may I ask what did you do to
achieve 135 queries/sec prior to the JVM swich?
ray,
On 1/27/06, Peter Keegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correction: make that 285 qps :)
>
> On 1/26/06, Peter Keegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Speaking of NioFSDirectory, I thought there was one posted a while
ago, is this something that can be used?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-414
ray,
On 11/22/05, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jay Booth wrote:
> > I had a similar problem with threading, the
Can we add a 1.9 release to the roadmap? or start a 1.9 release tracker issue?
ray,
On 10/15/05, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olivier,
>
> Your best bet it to discuss this on the java-dev list. At this
> point, we haven't a firm volunteer for pushing
I must admit that I have not downloaded the source yet. But a quick
question, does it deal w/ aggregate functions and group by clauses?
Thanks!
Ray,
On 9/17/05, markharw00d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Basically your lucene_query function will return a true/false in one
er grouped
records in the beginning.
In addition, it feels like reading the field values from the document
in order to look for group-by results is most time consuming.
How does RDBMS do it?
ray,
On 8/31/05, kapilChhabra (sent by Nabble.com) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> thanks a lot
I have come to peace with this problem. Basically, I think it's
because you need to read/find what you are deleting first? hehe
Writer just need to write whatever it's been told to write.
ray,
On 8/23/05, Mikko Noromaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why IndexRea
implementations of how index is structured, e.g.
RotatingIndex, AlternatingIndex, that rotates document updates to
different indices.
Ray,
On 8/23/05, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, this is not how you should do it.
> Use reader.delete(Term) method to delete docum
I also had similar problem. It was essentially a 'group by'-like
requirement.I used both get(fieldName) and getTermFreqVector(...),
it seemed that get(fieldName) on a page of results (say, 10 results
per page) was faster than getTermFreqVector() for me.
ray,
On 7/29/05, mark harwo
owever, It should be fine if it was rewritten from other queries.
Perhaps it should get cleaned up and be made a protected class for
now.
ray,
On 7/17/05, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> If you can share your BitSetQuery and QP modifications, feel free to
>
ad of the ones provided by the distribution.
Ray
On 7/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Mickaël,
>
> Take a look at the org.apache.lucene.search.DateFilter class that comes
> with Lucene. This does date range filtering (I am us
23 matches
Mail list logo
