may help. Some.
Try filling out the spreadsheet here:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2011/09/14/estimating-memory-and-storage-for-lucenesolr/
and you'll swiftly find out how hard abstract estimations are
Best
Erick
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Peter Miller
wrote:
> Oops again! Turns
a/Lucandra would be a better option anyways.
If Cassandra offers some of the same advantage as OpenStack Swift object store
does, then it should be the way to go.
Still looking for thoughts...
Thanks, The Captn
-Original Message-----
From: Peter Miller [mailto:peter.mil...@objectconsult
Best
Erick
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Peter Miller
wrote:
> Thanks for the response. Actually, I am more concerned with trying to use an
> Object Store for the indexes. The next concern is the use of a local index
> versus the sharded ones, but I'm more relaxed about that n
nt to data (25TB+)
it sounds not an issue of lucene but the logic of your app.
if you're afraid too many docs in one index you can make multiple indexes.
And then search across them, then merge, then over.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Peter Miller <
peter.mil...@objectconsulting.
Hi,
I have a little bit of an unusual set of requirements, and I am looking for
advice. I have researched the archives, and seen some relevant posts, but they
are fairly old and not specifically a match, so I thought I would give this a
try.
We will eventually have about 50TB raw, non-searchab