eloading. Please open an issue instead for discussion.
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 15.10.2024 um 09:06 schrieb Navneet Verma:
> > Hi Uwe,
> >
> > *>> thinking about it a bit more: In 10.x we already have some ways to
> > **preload
> > data with WILL_NEED (or
> requires files to be opened multiple times its a better compromise.
> >
> > Please note: we are focusing on 10.x, so please supply PRs/changes for
> > Lucene main branch only, backports will be done automatically. We
> > won't change the IOContexts in 9.x anymo
+1 on the question.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 6:35 PM Marc Davenport
wrote:
> Hello,
> I had this question buried in a previous email. I feel like I have a very
> loose grasp on the Lucene API and how to properly implement with it. I'm
> working on code that I didn't write myself from the ground
he
> checksumming is slower it should not be a big issue, because it won't
> affect searches, only merging of segments. And there the throughput
> should be high, but not top priority.
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 01.10.2024 um 04:52 schrieb Navneet Verma:
> > Hi
le times its a better compromise.
>
> Please note: we are focusing on 10.x, so please supply PRs/changes for
> Lucene main branch only, backports will be done automatically. We won't
> change the IOContexts in 9.x anymore.
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 01.10.2024 um 10:04 schrieb N
all bytes/pages in .vec/.veq files -- this asks the OS to
cache
> > all of those bytes into page cache (if there is enough free RAM). We do
> > this at Amazon (product search) for our production searching processes.
> > Otherwise paging in all .vec/.veq pages via random access pr
Hi Lucene Experts,
I wanted to understand the performance difference between opening and
reading the whole file using an IndexInput with IoContext as RANDOM vs READ.
I can see .vec files(storing the flat vectors) are opened with RANDOM and
whereas dvd files are opened as READ. As per my testing wi
