Re: Merge policy, optimization for small frequently changing indexes.

ene at some point - there is no > need to run optimize. > Read the javadocs for IndexWriter for details. See also > expungeDeletes(). That may be just what you need. > > > -- > Ian. > > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Naveen Kumar wrote: > > Hi > > I

Re: Merge policy, optimization for small frequently changing indexes.

Hi I have one more question, does Lucene purge the deleted documents before merging the segments, or purging of deleted documents done only when optimized? On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Naveen Kumar wrote: > Hi > I have a Very large number (say 3 million) of frequently changing

Merge policy, optimization for small frequently changing indexes.

number of indexes are very large). Any suggestions would be very helpful. -- Thanks Naveen Kumar

API to retrieve search results without scoring or sorting

HI Is there any API using which I can retrieve search results, such that they are neither scored nor sorted (for performance reasons). I just need the results, don't need any extra computation on that. Any suggestion will be very helpful. -- Thanks Naveen Kumar

Re: Personal Intro and a question on "find top 10 similar items" functionality

Hi Check out a class called MoreLikeThis in lucene. It should solve your problem. Naveen Kumar On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Igor Chudov wrote: > Hello, > > My name is Igor and I own a website algebra.com. I just joined. > > I have a database of answered algebra questio

Re: Adding a new field to existing Index

Thanks for the quick reply! I will go ahead with reindexing of all the data. On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > On 2010-07-07 14:49, Naveen Kumar wrote: > >> Hi Andrzej Bialecki >> >> When you suggested - >> "There are some other

Re: Adding a new field to existing Index

in such an index, without reindexing the whole index. Any suggestions will be very helpful! Thank you Naveen Kumar On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > On 2010-06-29 13:40, Naveen Kumar wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I need to add a new field (a stor

Re: Adding a new field to existing Index

field without > re-indexing. > > As for extracting content from the field, it should be possible to > retrieve data if the term vectors > were stored with positions offset > (Field.TermVector.WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS). If not, I don't > think it's possible. > > On Tue

Adding a new field to existing Index

, can somehow be retrieved. This would enable a work around solution to my problem. Thank you Naveen Kumar