Hello,
I have been looking in the documentation but haven't found a solution to
this:
is there a way to retrieve only the record "picasso" when the query is
picasso and not the records: "picasso","picasso pablo" ie a 100% match
of
Hello,
A small problem this time: I would like to retrieve the field name of a
PhraseQuery.
Could you tell me please which is the best way for this ?
Thank you,
Mile Rosu
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
mp;btnG=Search+Books
The returned page is the first one on which the phrase spans (but no
more highlighting).
It seems we are really close to a good solution, now looking for a way
to implementing it in terms of index structure.
Thanks again,
Mile Rosu
Erick Erickson wrote:
I can think of sev
this. Both pages should be returned as hit results.
Do you have any idea on how this situation might be handled?
Thank you,
Mile Rosu
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You should specify the field name for influenza as well.
Like this:
+doccontent:avian +doccontent:influenza +doctype:AM
+docdate:[2005033122000 TO
2006062022000]
Mile
-Original Message-
From: WATHELET Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:40 PM
To: j
Hello Supriya,
One possibility would be to search for both müller and mueller from the
interface. It means you should "normalize" in some way the search query you are
doing. This solution would not affect the content of the existing index (no
reindexing needed).
Greets,
Mile
-Original Mes
Hello,
The problem may be rather in the name of the field you are querying -
"prohibited" in your case.
You can check with Luke(http://www.getopt.org/luke/) the structure of
the index on which you are performing your query.
Mile
-Original Message-
From: Ferdinand Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
s from all of then indexes and then
search
: on one of the indexes again with the ID list ... use the ID lists
: generated from the supporting indexes (people and dates) to build a
: Filter
: that you can use when searching the main index.
:
:
:
: : Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:22:30 +0300
: : Fro
won't get the correct results.
Regards,
Mile Rosu
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:55 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using more than one index
A couple of suggestions...
1) don't use multip
). Gluing
and MM in a field like MM also would make your query look nicer.
Greets,
Mile Rosu
-Original Message-
From: Björn Ekengren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 11:51 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Best solution for the Date Range problem
Hi,
I
by the number of hits. This is
because when retrieving a field value from a document hit, the Lucene
engine loads all the fields from the index (the entire document). So if
in one search I get 300.000 hits cont, I have to iterate through all and
retrieve the @ID@ field value - this takes a lo
Analyzer that uses a Tokenizer that throws out non-characters will
do.
For example, take a look at SimpleAnalyzer. It uses LowerCaseTokenizer.
If you read the javadoc for LowerCaseTokenizer, I think you will see it
suits you.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Mile Rosu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
x? (in the example to store
the word "divinitatis").
Thank you a lot,
Mile Rosu
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo