You might want to take a look at Solr (http://lucene.apache.org/solr/). You
could either use Solr directly, or see how they implement paging.
--Mike
On Dec 26, 2007 12:12 PM, Zhou Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using the search function for pagination will carry out unnecessary index
> searc
Hello Bruce,
is there a way to set lucene so that it only parses/crawls through a given
portion of a website...
Lucene does not crawl anything on its own. It is simply a search
engine library. All indexing and crawling must be done by an
application that you create.
also, when lucene retu
Hello All,
Can anyone recommend a solution to get the top values of a field from
the results of a query? For example, If I have a field named "from"
is there a way to get the top occuring values in that field after I
filter the results based on a query?
Note:
Luke has a great tool that enumerat
I am also working on interfacing Lucene with PHP. Here are a couple
options that I have found useful:
Call Java directly from PHP:
http://php-java-bridge.sourceforge.net/
Solr - Interacts w/ Lucene via XML requests
http://incubator.apache.org/solr/index.html
There is mention of a PHP interface
ed to keep track of which indexes correspond to
which indices. Check the archives for the answer too, sorry for the
short reply.
Erik
On May 26, 2006, at 2:32 PM, Mike Richmond wrote:
> When using a MultiSearcher Is there anyway to get the name of the
> index that a hit came from
When using a MultiSearcher Is there anyway to get the name of the
index that a hit came from? One way would be to add the index name as
a field to each document, but I am hoping to avoid this.
Thanks,
Mike
-
To unsubscribe, e
I'm running into similar sort issues when I try to sort my results on
a date field that was created using the DateTools class as follows:
DateTools.dateToString(dateObj, DateTools.Resolution.SECOND);
I am then storing this in a stored, untokenized field named "date".
When I sort the results by d
Hello Harini,
When you are finished indexing the documents are you running the
optimize() method on the IndexWriter before closing it? This should
reduce the number of segments and make searching faster. Just a
thought.
--Mike
On 5/22/06, Harini Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
Hello Andreas,
This may also be a good reference for you:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/fileformats.html
--Mike
On 5/16/06, Andreas Harth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to learn a bit more about the index organization of
Lucene (ideally without sifting through source code).
Hi Erick,
I appreciate the help. I am using the "StandardAnalyzer" for both the
query and for indexing.
--Mike
On 5/10/06, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll take a quick stab at it. What analyzer are you using with the query? In
the search page of Luke, near the upper right ther
n idea
what's happening with your test field.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Mike Richmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2006 10:18:29 PM
Subject: Lucene query question
I am new to Lucene, but the behavior that I am seeing does not s
I am new to Lucene, but the behavior that I am seeing does not seem to
make sense to me. I am using the latest version of Lucene (1.9.1) and
executing the following code below which creates an index with a
single document and only one field (named "test") with a value of
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
If
12 matches
Mail list logo
