right now - it is query
easy to understand and straightforward when looking in source code. I built
my own version of FuzzyQuery some time ago based on MultiTermQuery class.
MW
[image: photo]
*Michael Wilkowski*
Chief Technology Officer, Silent Eight Pte Ltd
+48 600 995 603 | m
Hi,
I am building an app that will create multiple term queries join with OR
(>100 primitive TermQuery'ies).
Is there a real performance gain implementing custom MultiTermQuery instead
of simply joining multiple TermQuery with OR?
Regards,
MW
CustomAnalyzer builder and set it there.
>
> Alan Woodward
> www.flax.co.uk
>
>
> > On 12 Jan 2017, at 10:57, Michael Wilkowski wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I wanted to subclass StandardTokenizer to manipulate a little with
> > PositionAttribute. I wanted to i
...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> I don't think it's about efficiency but rather about not exposing
> possibly trappy APIs / usage ...
>
> Do you have a particular class/method that you'd want to remove final from?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccan
Hi,
I sometimes wonder what is the purpose of so heavy "final" methods and
classes usage in Lucene. It makes it my life much harder to override
standard classes with some custom implementation.
What comes first to my mind is runtime efficiency (compiler "knows" that
this class/method will not be o
My guess: more conditions = less documents to score and sort to return.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Rajnish kamboj
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there any Lucene performance benchmark against certain set of data?
> [i.e Is there any stats for search throughput which Lucene can provide for
> a certain d
Hi,
I need to implement a function that performs fuzzy search on multiple terms
in the way that a summarized distance 2 from ALL terms is allowed. For
example query:
Lucene Apache Group
with maximum distance 2 should match:
Luceni Apachi Group
Lucen Apache Group
Luce Apache Group
but not:
Luce
Hi,
in my opinion your system locales have nothing to do with the analyzers
that you want to apply. I would not rely on system locales as that makes
application very unportable.
Regarding any other way - there are none. You may apply regex query and
create custom queries, but not dynamically refer
Hi,
please explain I get it correctly: do you want to search your query within
all possible locales? If yes then my personal pattern in such case would be
to create multiple BooleanClause (with Occur.SHOULD, one clause per each
locale) and add them to one BooleanQuery.
MW
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at
Definitely b). I would also suggest groups and expanding user groups at
user sign in time.
MW
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Ian Lea wrote:
> I'd definitely go for b). The index will of course be larger for every
> extra bit of data you store but it doesn't sound like this would make much
>
I recommend reading
http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html?m=1
Just use mmapdirectory and let operating system do the rest.
MW
Sent from Mi phone
On 21 May 2016 12:42, "Prateek Singhal" wrote:
> You can consider that I want to store the lucene index in some sor
You mixed lowerDate with upperDate.
MW
Sent from Mi phone
On 25 Dec 2015 16:41, "kaog" wrote:
> hi
> I did the change of variable "ISBN, it was a mistake I did when I wrote in
> the post. unfortunately still it does not work TermRangeQuery. :(
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://
Hi Doug,
your attachment is not available (likely security settings). Please put it
in github or somewhere else and provide a link to download.
MW
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Kunzman, Douglas * <
douglas.kunz...@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
>
> Jack -
>
> Thanks a lot for taking the time to try and
It is because your index does not contain term quar* and this statistics
function is not a query (you have to pass exact form of the term). To count
terms that meet search criteria you may run search query with custom
collector and count results. Or use normal search query returning TopDocs
and jus
Instanceof?
MW
Sent from Mi phone
On 28 Nov 2015 06:57, "Sandeep Khanzode"
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question.
> In my program, I need to check whether the input query is a MatchAll Query
> that contains no terms, or a Query (any variant) that has at least one
> term. For typical Term queries, thi
Try some examples from stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24968697/how-to-implements-auto-suggest-using-lucenes-new-analyzinginfixsuggester-api
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Bhaskar wrote:
> Could you please some help here?
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Bhaskar wrote:
Yes, according to Lucene in Action book, you cannot use field cache in such
situations.
MW
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Yonghui Zhao wrote:
> If I index one filed more than 1 times, it seems I can't get all values
> from lucene field cache?
>
> right?
>
and why separate indexes will be much more
efficient.
Regards,
Michael Wilkowski
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Sascha Janz wrote:
> hello,
>
> we must make a design decision for our system. we have many customers wich
> all should use the same server. now we are thinking about to m
18 matches
Mail list logo
