Re: Getting irrelevant results using fuzzy query

2008-06-28 Thread László Monda
with FuzzyQuery. Using FuzzyLikeThisQuery made the relevance much better, so I'm really happy with the results. Thank you very much! > > Cheers > Mark > > > - Original Message > From: László Monda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.or

Re: Getting irrelevant results using fuzzy query

2008-06-23 Thread László Monda
ot;Phul", "Saul", and "Paulo" before ANY "Paul" records due to IDF issues. > Using FuzzyLikeThisQuery puts all the "Paul" records ahead of the variants. > > > > - Original Message > From: László Monda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Getting irrelevant results using fuzzy query

2008-06-23 Thread László Monda
Hi Daniel, On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 20:37 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote: > On Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2008, László Monda wrote: > > > Since fuzzy searching is based on the Levenshtein distance, the distance > > between "coldplay" and "coldplay" is 0 and the distance be

Re: Getting irrelevant results using fuzzy query

2008-06-23 Thread László Monda
of the Fuzzy class with it. I got the same irrelevant results than before. Do you have any ideas what's going on here? > > Cheers, > Mark > > László Monda wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > I've been redirected from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to here to discuss > &g

Re: Getting irrelevant results using fuzzy query

2008-06-23 Thread László Monda
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 21:10 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote: > On Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2008, László Monda wrote: > > > Additional info: Lucene seems to do the right thing when only few > > documents are present, but goes crazy when there is about 1.5 million > > documents in the

Getting irrelevant results using fuzzy query

2008-06-18 Thread László Monda
query.add(song_query, BooleanClause.Occur.MUST); } Please let me know what's wrong, I'd like to make this work right. Thanks in advance! -- My reply to an answer ------ On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 20:38 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote: > On Dienstag, 17. Juni 2008, László