ning. I
> think we should put this as one of component in lucene-contrib. What do you
> say? Committer and owner please comment.
> Regards,
> Allahbaksh
> -Original Message-
> From: Kerang Lv [mailto:lvkrne...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009
> 9:34
ember 15, 2009 6:05:15 PM
Subject: Re: Run your Lucene Applications on Google AppEngine with GAELucene
This is great news! Are you happy with the the performance of the google
data store? Do you plan to support in memory indexes using the memcache api?
Thanks
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:04 PM, K
. I
think we should put this as one of component in lucene-contrib. What do you
say? Committer and owner please comment.
Regards,
Allahbaksh
-Original Message-
From: Kerang Lv [mailto:lvkrne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 9:34 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi Lucene users,
Enlightened by the discussion "Can I run Lucene in google app engine?
[http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-run-Lucene-in-google-app-engine--td23017742.html],
I implemented a google datastore based Lucene component, GAELucene, which can
help you to run search applications on google app
Does the IndexWriter.mergeFactor remain the same
effect on the RAM use after the introduce of
IndexWriter.minMergeDocs?
The minMergeDocs was introduced into
IndexWriter(Revision 1.21 in cvs) in order to control
the number of
Documents merged in RAMDirectory independently of the
mergeFactor (see
ht
