On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 18:10:26 + (GMT), mark harwood wrote:
"to be able" != "able to be"
> OK, I thought you wanted to count terms within the
> title field. If you want to group counts on the whole
> field value change the loop in my last post to this:
>
> for(int i=0;i {
> String fiel
Hey Mark, thanks for the code sample. I did look into this, but for a book's
title field, for example,
"to be able" != "able to be"
and
"java programmer" != "programmer (java)" - tokenizer will remove the
parentheses
so in my use case at least, a field value isn't simply an array of its terms.
Ah, I apologize. My use of the word "frequency" was misleading. By that, I
meant, the number of hits/documents, whose fields have that value. Once again:
doc a=title:1,keyword:a,contents:somelongmemoryhoggingstring
doc b=title:1,keyword:a,contents:somelongmemoryhoggingstring
doc c=title:1,keyword
Neither. :-)
4) Top 10 fieldvalues (for some fields) returned in search results
So, let's say the results of a search were:
doc a=title:1,keyword:a,contents:somelongmemoryhoggingstring
doc b=title:1,keyword:a,contents:somelongmemoryhoggingstring
doc c=title:1,keyword:b,contents:somelongmemoryhog
Mark,
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:56:37 + (GMT), mark harwood wrote:
>> But I suppose for Document
>> has to be further subclassed so that the other
>> non-initialized fields can be obtained as well, or
>>
> I don't think Document would be the right place for
> this - as a design pattern it is cast
:52 +, markharw00d wrote:
> Did you mean this?
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lucene-user&m=108525376821114&w=2
>
>
> Kelvin Tan wrote:
>
>> This is a bump post...
>>
>> I'm wondering if there's any code (contributed, bugzilla, cor
This is a bump post...
I'm wondering if there's any code (contributed, bugzilla, core or otherwise)
that provides document lazy-loading functionality, i.e. only eager-initialize
specific fields, or load fields on-demand.
Thanks,
k
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:55:00 +0100, Kelvin Tan wrote:
Is this actually in the codebase? I couldn't find it in SVN or in Bugzilla...
kelvin
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:59:54 -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Or perhaps you
> need to investigate the (is it in the codebase already?) patch to
> load fields lazily upon demand instead.
-
