Re: JDBC access to a Lucene index

2009-10-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
ODCI API and > replacing the Lucene file system storage by a BLOB storage. Thanks for the pointer! Lucene Domain Index is not exactly what I'm looking for, but it's seems close enough for me to at least borrow some ideas fro

Re: JDBC access to a Lucene index

2009-10-17 Thread Jukka Zitting
of tables based on some document type field) and would allow you to use simple SQL SELECTs to query data. Any pointers would be welcome. If this hasn't already been done, would there be interest in such a JDBC driver for Lucene? [1] http://dev.day.com/microsling/content/blogs/main/jdbc2

Re: Proposal for changing Lucene's backwards-compatibility policy

2009-10-16 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Danil Ε’ORIN wrote: > What about creating major version more often? +1 We're not going to run out of version numbers, so I don't see a reason not to upgrade the major version number when making backwards-incompatible changes. BR,

Re: Use of tika for parsing, offsets questions

2009-09-03 Thread Jukka Zitting
tika parser and lucene analyzer? Currently Tika doesn't expose that information but the Tika Parser API was designed for such use in mind, so it will be possible to add the offset information. Please file a Tika feature request [1] for this. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA B