Hi
I'am getting TooManyClauses exception while performing wildcard query.
I'am thinking about changing max clause count limit
(BooleanQuery.setMaxClauseCount() method). My question referes to memory
consumption in case of increasing maxClauseCount parameter.
Does Lucene do it in a smart way (
Hi
Each document found in a Lucene index contains scoring information however
it doesn't provide (in the same easy way as scoring) an information about a
number of occurrences of searched terms in its contents.
Using Lucene API I can check each searched term against its frequecies in
each found do
Hi
Each document found in a Lucene index contains scoring information
however it doesn't provide (in the same easy way as scoring) an
information about a number of occurrences of searched terms in its contents.
Using Lucene API I can check each searched term against its frequecies
in each foun
Hi
Lets say we have a single lucene document that has two text fields:
field1 and field2.
Data kept in field1 is a long string that changes rarely. It takes some
time to index it.
Data kept in field2 is a short string and changes often.
Is it possible to update (reindex) document field2 withou
Thank you
JS
--- Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/6/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >// inherit javadocs
> > public String[] getStrings (IndexReader reader,
> String field)
> >
> > The string array I get back, is
Hi
I need to access min and max values of a particular field in the index, as
soon as a searcher is initialized. I don't need it later. Looking at old
newsgroup mails, I found a few recommendations.
One was to keep the min and max fields external to the index. But this will
not work
Hi
We are in the process of upgrading Lucene from 1.2 to 1.9.
There used to be 2 methods in DateField.java in 1.2
public static String MIN_DATE_STRING()
public static String MAX_DATE_STRING()
This basically gave the minimum and the maximum dates we could index using
same number of docs. Wouldn't people want to stick with just
one index in any case?
Any comments or response appreciated.
JZ
John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A while ago I had asked a question on what would be a good solution for a
situation mentioned below and I was poi
no
way of addressing the situation.
JZ
Eyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Run a search on "Lucene ParallelReader" in
google - You'll find something
Doug Cutting wrote that I believe is what you're looking for.
Eyal
> -Original Message-
> From: Joh
Hi
I am using the ParallelReader feature from Lucene 1.9.
I have 2 indexes, one that doesnât change and the other that changes often. I
delete and re-index documents from the dynamic index often.
I am indexing the documents with a keyword field âidâ and giving it a
unique number. Th
Thank you.
I will try that
JS
Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 12, 2005, at 2:04 PM, John Smith wrote:
> I have Lucene 1.4.3 codebase and I got Parallel Reader from the
> trunk along with a few changes that need to go on top of it to make
> it compile.
I highl
Hi,
I have Lucene 1.4.3 codebase and I got Parallel Reader from the trunk along
with a few changes that need to go on top of it to make it compile.
II have 2 indexes, against which I am querying using the Parallel Reader. Most
of my queries work great. Thanks for the great work on this featu
Thank you . That does look like what I want
JS
Eyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Run a search on "Lucene ParallelReader" in google - You'll find something
Doug Cutting wrote that I believe is what you're looking for.
Eyal
> -Original Message-
>
Hi all
This is a slightly long email. Pardon me.
As Lucene does not allow for updating an existing document in the index, the
only option is to delete and reindex the message.When you have too many
updates, this gets a little cumbersome. In our case, as such the actual content
of the do
14 matches
Mail list logo
