Hello,
Is there any benefit of using one or other for "start with query"?
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PrefixQuery-vs-wildcardquery-tp25649045p25649045.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
tom
> Similarity at query time to ignore the length normalisation factor.
>
> Cheers
> Mark
>
>
>
> On 7 Jul 2009, at 19:31, John Seer wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have 100k index with documents with one searchable field in it.
>> That
&g
Hello,
I have 100k index with documents with one searchable field in it. That
field has multiple values for example
doc( search: X search : X Y search: X Y Z id:1)
doc( search: X Y K id:2)
I am using Standard Analyzer for building and searching, and having problem
with scores
if the term is "
about - and if my term contains &
or \ no results
I tried to use QueryParser.escape(); before passing into parser. I am not
getting error during quering but not result is found
Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:27 PM, John Seer wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
&
Hello,
I am using KeywordAnalyzer for one of the fields and have problem with it.
When my original term has not English characters as well as - & \ /.
Is there any alternative for this. Or how to solve the issue with
characters?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com
p easily.
>
> simon
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Seer wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> Is there any class in lucene which will do encoding for term?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Lucene
Hello,
Is there any class in lucene which will do encoding for term?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-Term-Encoder-tp24228145p24228145.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
If I understand you guys correct
If I have term which has n tokens I will need to create n SpanTermQuery put
them in array and pass it to SpanNearQuery?
Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 12, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Erik Hatcher
>> wrote:
>>
Thanks this is useful class for future...
Koji Sekiguchi-2 wrote:
>
> John Seer wrote:
>> Hello,
>> There is any way that a single document fields can have different
>> analyzers
>> for different fields?
>>
>> I think one way of doing it to create cust
Hello,
There is any way that a single document fields can have different analyzers
for different fields?
I think one way of doing it to create custom analyzer which will do field
spastic analyzes..
Any other suggestions?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Different-Anal
Hello,
I have 3 terms and I want to much them in order I tried to use wildcard
query I am not getting any results back
Terms: A C F
Doc: name:A B C D E F
query: name:A*C*F
I am not getting any results back,
Please any suggestions?
Thanks for help in advance
--
View this message in context
Koji Sekiguchi-2 wrote:
>
> If you omit norms when indexing the name field, you'll get same score
> back.
>
> Koji
>
During building I set omit norms, but result doesn't change at all. I am
still getting the same score
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-help-w
Any ideas?
John Seer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have 5 lucene documents
>
> name: Apple
> name: Apple martini
> name: Apple drink
> name: Apple sweet drink
>
> I am using lucene default similarity and standard analyzer .
>
> When I am searching for
13 matches
Mail list logo