Brilliant, that looks perfect. We're currently using an older version of
Lucene in which this was an experimental class. Looks like we should
upgrade.
Thanks
Jim
On 5 August 2011 02:10, Trejkaz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Jim Swainston
> wrote:
> > So if
My Apologies Hoss, perhaps I should have been clearer. I'm trying to
programatically build a BooleanQuery from text input. I want the
BooleanQuery that is built to have the correct structure based on the
precedence rules of Boolean Logic.
So if the Text input is:
Marketing AND Smith OR Davies
I
But the query parser doesn't seem to do that for me with the input Marketing
AND Smith OR Davies. The query parser gives me 3 clauses. 1 must clause for
the term Marketing, 1 must clause for the term smith and 1 should clause for
the term Davies. e.g. +Marketing +Smith SHOULD Davies. What I would l
r
> logic you need with BooleanClause.Occur.
>
>
> There are alternative parsers in contrib. They might have more
> support for grouping clauses.
>
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Jim Swainston
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'
Hi,
I'm having trouble thinking of a way to effectively group clauses to form
sub queries. For example, I need to handle the following query:
Marketing AND Smith OR Davies.
Lucene is currently parsing this as +Marketing +Smith Davies meaning that
results where only the term Davies is found are
