Thanks for the ref - didn't know about Pig before.
the language and approach looks useful, so now I'm wondering if it
couldn't be used
across lucene over hadoop too. If data was indexed in lucene and Pig knew that,
then it could make for an interesting alternate lucene query language.
could this w
Hi all,
After I've run a query I need to know which terms matched each
result document (ie doc termfrequency>0).
the only way I know to do this is by calling explain on each document,
which the documentation claims to be
almost the equivalent of a new query for each call so I'm keen to
avoid th
s too)
Cheers
Jason.
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Nov 5, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Jason Eacott wrote:
Hi All, I hope someone can offer some advice.
I want to extend lucene to search in a particular way(if it cant
already):
I want to index docs, each with file containing several terms
something
Hi All, I hope someone can offer some advice.
I want to extend lucene to search in a particular way(if it cant already):
I want to index docs, each with file containing several terms something
like:
doc1=>myfield:a
doc2=>myfield:a,b
doc3=>myfield:a,b,c
doc4=>myfield:a,b,c,d
so far nothing new.
Hi,
I recently upgraded from lucene 1.3 final to 1.4 and discovered some
things
which no longer seem to work right.
I am using
Analyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer();
QueryParser parser = new QueryParser( "terms", analyzer);
parser.setOperator(QueryParser.DEFAULT_OPERATOR_AND);
q
