Here's an archive link from this mailing list regarding serializing queries, I
guess this would work for Automaton objects as well.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/201603.mbox/browser
Hope it helps.
Jim
From: José Tomás Atria
S
We use Kryo to pass query objects between hosts:
https://github.com/EsotericSoftware/kryo
We initially had some trouble with it creating dynamic classes and running out
of PermGen space but we got around that using an ObjectPool:
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-pool/api-1.6/org/apache/
Hi Scott,
I don't know your reasons for splitting your index up, but assuming you want to
do that and then merge the search results back together I think you could
re-unify the term document frequencies across all your indexes and then extend
IndexSearcher and override termStatistics and collec
ks? Meaning Adrien's comment is a
> whole lot significant? Merges ALWAYS pre-merge CheckIntegrity? Is this
> a 5.0 feature drop? You can't deprecate, um, er totally remove an
> index time audit feature on a point release of any level IMHO.
>
>
> -Original Message-
&g
compared to 4.x?
This sounds robust. Is the index batch creation workflow a separate process?
Distributed shared filesystems?
--will
-Original Message-
From: McKinley, James T [mailto:james.mckin...@cengage.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 2:22 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi Adrien and Will,
Thanks for your responses. I work with Selva and he's busy right now with
other things, so I'll add some more context to his question in an attempt to
improve clarity.
The merge in question is part of our batch indexing workflow wherein we index
new content for a given par
Hi Stan,
I played around with LIRE a couple years ago. I don't know exactly how it
works, but it doesn't just use Lucene from what I remember, it has its own
classes built around Lucene to perform the image search. There used to be a
PDF of a paper on the site, but I couldn't find a link when
Hi Clive,
We essentially do what you're suggesting, namely we create a single index
searcher (as well as the directory reader it uses) on each partition that is
shared amongst all threads. We also perform various index operations
(searching, browsing terms etc.) for a while to "warm up" Lucene
are away users,
because I don't want them having index corruption.
I am sick of people asking "but isnt it fine on the latest version"
and so on. It is not.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:41 AM, McKinley, James T
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A couple mailing list members have brought t
ng
G1GC with the 64-bit JVM given that it has better performance on large heaps
which are becoming more common today.
FWIW,
Jim
From: McKinley, James T [james.mckin...@cengage.com]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 11:00 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE:
course, is critically important to Solr so
from that perspective it is about Solr too.
https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/JavaBugs
And, I assume, it also applies to your custom app.
FWIW,
Erick
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:10 PM, McKinley, James T
wrote:
> Just to be clear in case there wa
/lucene-java/JavaBugs?
Regards
Piotr
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:55 PM, McKinley, James T <
james.mckin...@cengage.com> wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> OK, thanks for the info. We'll see if we can download the Lucene test
> suite and check it out.
>
> FWIW, we use G1GC in our pro
h_these_settings.html)
In fact, the problems with G1GC can sometimes lead to index corruption, and are
hard to reproduce. So better don't use...
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
&
Why do you say not to use G1GC? We are using Java 7 & G1GC with Lucene 4.8.1
in production. Thanks.
Jim
From: Uwe Schindler [u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 2:49 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org; 'kiwi clive'
Subject: RE: Lucene Versi
r)
-Mike
On 1/22/15 11:27 AM, McKinley, James T wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thanks describing how block join queries were intended to work. Your
> description makes sense to me, however according to the API docs:
>
> http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_8_0/join/org/apache/lucene/search/join/ToC
ument. A child can't be its own parent.
BlockJoin is a very powerful feature, but what it's really doing is
modelling relationships using an index that doesn't know what a
relationship is. The relationships are determined by a combination of the
order that you indexed the block,
in query, but the mailing list rejected my message, if there's a
better place to send/upload this index let me know and I surely will. Thanks
again for any help.
Jim
____
From: Gregory Dearing [gregdear...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 1:01 PM
To: java-user@lucene.ap
Hi,
I'm attempting to use ToChildBlockJoinQuery in Lucene 4.8.1 by following Mike
McCandless' blog post:
http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2012/01/searching-relational-content-with.html
I have a set of child documents which are named works and a set of parent
documents which are named persons tha
Hello,
I have a problem when i search with lucene, but i dont know if this is a
problem of my Index or my Search.
At Index, I have like parameter a list of data of an individual(the list is
with data of my Ontology Individuals)
The list has values like "Name:PeterRooney", "Age:25", "From:NY" if
Hello,
I have a problem when i search with lucene, but i dont know if this is a
problem of my Index or my Search.
At Index, I have like parameter a list of data of an individual
The list has values like "Name:PeterRooney", "Age:25", "From:NY" if the
individual is a person
but if the individual i
filters is slow?
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:01 PM, James Clarke wrote:
>> Are there any best practices for constructing Filters to search efficiently?
>> From my non-exhaustive experiments I cannot intuit how to construct my
>> filters
advice on optimizing these filters would be appreciated!
James
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
Hi All,
Can you please let me know if there is an equivalent of
LatLongDistanceFilter in Lucene 4.4 API.
This API was present in Lucene 3.6 API.
I have to mainly compute whether a point(lat,lang) is
present at a distance d from another point(lat,lang).
I have checked different classes from the s
your solr-related question by posting
to the solr-user list rather than the java-user list.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Danzig, Scott [mailto:scott.dan...@nymag.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:03 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
Samuel,
Do you think you could write a failing unit test and open a JIRA issue? Or at
the least open a JIRA issue with all the details without a test?
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Samuel García Martínez [mailto:samuelgmarti...@gmail.com
ed through these means.
Is this the same thing as flexible indexing, or are we missing something
fundamental?
Regards,
James Masanz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
? Improvement? New Feature?
Thanks,
James Clarke
Basis Technology Corp.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Ian Lea wrote:
> Feels a bit of a hack, but you might be able to make it work by
> storing the field name when MyPerFieldxxx.get(name) is called and
> using that in MyPerFieldxxx.qu
filtering during this step. I am certain there is a better way, but this
one does work.
Thanks for the help getting me here.
Jim Nolan
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, James Nolan
wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up.
>
> I was using org.apache.lucene.search.FilteredQuery which says it applies a
-
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Nolan [mailto:nolansolrlistse...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 7:26 PM
> > T
own investigations I
believe that the only time a conflict will occur is if enablePositionIncrements
in Stopfilter is true while enablePositionIncrements in QueryParser is false.
Would I be correct in this assumption?
Thanks for the help,
James
ell.
Oh almost forgot -- I use PDFBox to extract the images from the PDFs.
James
THX
--
James J. Wilson II
Systems Engineer
U.S. District Court
District of New Mexico
333 Lomas Blvd., NW
Albuquerque, NM 87102
Phone: (505) 348-2081
Fax:
thks steve, i get it.
2008/10/24 Steven A Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi James,
>
> On 10/23/2008 at 8:30 AM, James liu wrote:
> > public class AnalyzerTest {
> >@Test
> >public void test() throws ParseException {
> >QueryParser parser =
public class AnalyzerTest {
@Test
public void test() throws ParseException {
QueryParser parser = new MultiFieldQueryParser(new String[]{"title",
"body"}, new StandardAnalyzer());
Query query1 = parser.parse("中文");
Query query2 = parser.parse("中 文");
System.out.pri
--JP
On Dec 19, 2007 1:14 PM, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Yes.
>
> Mike
>
> Hartrich, James CTR USTRANSCOM J6 wrote:
>
> > Is this at least a semi-active list?
> >
> > James
> >
>
>
>
Is this at least a semi-active list?
James
Hi, guys,
I found Analyzers for Japanese, Korean and Chinese, but not stemmers;
the Snowball stemmers only include European languages. Does stemming
not make sense for ideograph-based languages (i.e., no stemming is
needed for Japanese, Korean and Chinese)?
Also for spell checking, does the defau
U should split your index.
large index will cause query speed, optimize speed when u index.
2007/6/7, 童小军 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
my indexfile to 8G when I optionze() the index.program is too slow . and
some time IOException. And use TOO memory .
xiaojun tong
010-64489518-613
[EMAIL PROTEC
sorry,,i not see it clearly
match in a document.
2007/5/28, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
maybe solr facet fit for u
.http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview
2007/5/28, Anny Bridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I use lucene in my project and it works w
maybe solr facet fit for u.http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview
2007/5/28, Anny Bridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I use lucene in my project and it works well.
Now I hope that the search result presenting to the user include the times
of the keyword match in a document.
Is there so
it seems not quick.
http://demo1.minalyzer.com/minalyzerlite/search4.php?q=test&offset=0
Results 1 - 15 of 16 for test.(1.586 seconds)
2007/5/20, Saurabh Dani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Greetings All,
We would like to introduce our java lucene based command line search tool,
Minalyzer Lite.
Also, note that there are multiple windows here for a single
document, we can't just search between min start and max end.
Ideas from those more familiar with lucene would be greatly appreciated.
James
-
To unsubsc
unsubscribe
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 6:25 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: customizing index file name
Oh, fix as in make constant, not fix as in broken ...
No, I don't know of any way to do this. Can your installer just
pack up everything in a directory?
Erick
On 5/3/07, Shaw, Jam
hing
with it at all. What behavior are you observing that you want
to change and why?
Erick
On 5/3/07, Shaw, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how to fix the .cfs file name in an index directory?
> The deletable and segments file names are always the same, but we
Does anyone know how to fix the .cfs file name in an index directory?
The deletable and segments file names are always the same, but we have
observed that the .cfs file name changes each time you index a content
directory with some changes to the directory (some deleted files, added
files, etc). H
Does it mean DBSight is Free?
2007/4/24, Chris Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
For those who may be interested,
DBSight 1.4.0 now has unlimited index size with Free version!
Basically DBSight is more like SOLR + database adapter. You just point
it with one or several SQLs to any database, and you can
You can read demo source code from lucene source package.
2007/3/16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I am new to Lucene Java API.
I want to use StandardAnalyzer for tokenizing my document. How can I
use it?
Further how can I index "Acronym" and "Company name" as one term.
I used the following settings for speeding up indexing on a similarly sized
db table
If you have enough ram it might help you.
IndexWriter writer = *new* IndexWriter(fdDir,*new* StandardAnalyzer(), *true
*);
writer.setMergeFactor(100);
writer.setMaxMergeDocs(99);
writer.setMaxBufferedDocs(
by default)
if you want it to work iwthout tokenizing, you need to use something like
hte PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper, and the KeywordAnalyzer for hte city field
... the KeywordAnalyzer at query time will leave the query text
untokenized so it can match the untokenized value you indexed.
: Date: Sat, 4
plating like Velocity.
--
Chris Lu
-
Instant Full-Text Search On Any Database/Application
site: http://www.dbsight.net
demo: http://search.dbsight.com
On 11/4/06, James Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone successfully implemented a web services front end
on't break the query places you
don't expect. But if you index Austin UN_TOKENZED, then search for it
using,
say StandardAnalyzer, it'll look for austin and they won't match. This may
apply to Luke too. In Luke, you can choose a different analyzer
(WhitespaceAnalyzer comes to
Has anyone successfully implemented a web services front end to remotely
search a Lucene index? I've tried to do it with the Xfire stuff in
MyEclipse, but their default Aegis xml mapping stuff doesn't support the
Lucene Hits object. I'd like to avoid searching a remote index via RMI, but
for now i
I'm using the 2.0 branch and I've had issues with searching indexes where
the fields aren't tokenized.
For instance, my index consists of count,lastname,city,state and I used the
following code to index it (the data is in a sql server db):
*
if*(count != 0) {
doc.add(*new* Field("count", NumberU
ter(fragmentLength)
highlighter.setTextFragmenter(fragmenter)
tokenStream = analyzer.tokenStream('f', StringReader(text))
return highlighter.getBestFragments(tokenStream, text,
numFragments)
Basically, I want to show partial word matches also.
James
-
Wow, thanks, just found a significant bug - thought I was using
StandardAnalyzer throughout but was not!! ouch! Nasty typo.
Thanks again.
James
On Sep 28, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Sure, what analyzer are you using? Both for indexing and parsing
the query?
I'll bet
Query q = parser.parse("jorourke burmilla")
does return the document!!
Anyone have any ideas?
James
PS. The code is a rough translation but you get the idea. For some
reason I think the index doesn't like "."'s in words.
-
thk,,,Cohen and lin.
2006/9/6, Doron Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I think that Nutch would crawl and search all these 3 types. Not sure that
Nutch would provide the framework you seem to look for, but perhaps it is
worth to take a look - http://lucene.apache.org/nutch/
"James l
u must have knowledge how to extract
information from them and what kind of keys they need to be set.
Then you can do what you want to.
On 9/5/06, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i wanna find frame which can index xml,word,excel,pdf,,,not one.
>
>
> 2006/9/6, Do
files?
"James liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/09/2006 19:14:24:
> i find lius many question so i wanna give up and find new.
>
> who recommend ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i find lius many question so i wanna give up and find new.
who recommend ?
After reading 'lucene in action', i know the format of indexfile.
which way lucene read index file? line by line?
I m very interesting.
i wanna index html,,,but it have image,flash,javascript, and i wanna make
index quick,,
but i don't know how to get textmode content,,,
anyone can help me?
You misunderstand.
This sql just tell what i wanna do.
i have five user_group and i wanna group result which lucene do.
2006/7/20, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
No. Lucene is not a relational database and doesn't speak SQL.
Otis
- Original Message
From: James
for example:
$sql = "select count(*), user_group from groups where uid>0 group by
user_group;
can lucene query this result?
i wanna use "+","-","and","or","not"
"*"
who know?
2006/7/15, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
yes,it can do...but now work for chinese search. english search is ok.
and how can i fix it?
2006/7/15, Doron Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hits hits = searcher.search(qp.Query(queryStr));
>
> I think it should
yes,it can do...but now work for chinese search. english search is ok.
and how can i fix it?
2006/7/15, Doron Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hits hits = searcher.search(qp.Query(queryStr));
I think it should be qp.parse(String query) (rather than qp.Query(String
field))
i can compile it correctly.but it can not search anything.
i can't find error...so wanna u help me?
package kk;
import java.io.*;
import java.util.Date;
//import org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer;
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cjk.CJKAnalyzer;
import org.apache.lucene.d
ctor in my search as opposed to a
search method which returns a Hits object. Thanx.
JAMES
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Would Lucene's FuzzyQuery be useful in this case? I
suppose it would depend on how meaningful the
sequences of numbers are.
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/FuzzyQuery.html
--- Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : I could (1) up front, put in both vers
i fix it...when i "import org.apache.lucene.demo.FileDocument;"
and thk u for ur answer.
2006/7/10, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: when i try javac Package: org.apache.lucene.demo;
: name is IndexFiles.java
:
: it show me : FileDocument ,error info : cannot resolve symbol
:
:
: how c
when i try javac Package: org.apache.lucene.demo;
name is IndexFiles.java
it show me : FileDocument ,error info : cannot resolve symbol
how can i compile it?
txt
will contain "update"; however if the lucene internals
do this:
mkdir x
echo original > x/x.txt
cp -lr x x.copy
--> rm x/x.txt
echo update > x/x.txt
diff x/x.txt x.copy/x.txt
Then x/x.txt will have a different inode from
x.copy/x.txt and thei
a
little extra maintenance overhead.
JAMES
--- Larry Ogrodnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have a similar setup, although probably only
> 1/5th the number of
> documents and updates. I'd suggest just making
> periodic index backups.
>
> I've been storin
constructor, before calling the collect method, or
calculate the total result count/document id set in
the collect method and then execute some sort of
post-collect method, right? So I was just wondering
which method was better/faster. Thanx.
JAMES
--- Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
r the index in
order to populate the BitSet and then doing another
pass while calling the collect method? Thanx.
JAMES
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yaho
e cache
hit ratio is very low). If someone thinks my use of
HitCollector is flawed, I'm certainly open to
suggestions. Thanx.
JAMES
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection arou
eve is slightly more
efficient.
JAMES
--- "heritrix.lucene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This will break performance. It is better to first
> collect all the document
> > numbers (code without the proper declarations):
> >
> > public void collect(int id,
new
MyHitCollector(yourSearcher,500,20);
yourSearcher.search(yourQuery,hc);
List results = hc.getDocuments();
Now results should contain the 1001st-1020th results.
JAMES
--- "heritrix.lucene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am using Hits object to collect all documents.
> Let me
Hey Eric,
I think you want:
fsWriter.addIndexes(Directory[] {ramDir});
to be:
fsWriter.addIndexes(new Directory[]{ramDir});
JAMES
--- zheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a novice in lucene. I write some code to do
> batch indexing using
> RAMDirectory according to the c
completeQuery.add(userEntered,true,false);
completeQuery.add(otherQuery,true,false);
Then just use completeQuery in your search. Hope I
understood your issue correctly. Also as a note, the
syntax above will work in Lucene 1.4.3, but it looks
like BooleanQuery.add() has changed in 2.0.0.
JAMES
---
ing the
indexing process that cause a file not found error?
JAMES
--- WATHELET Thomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm creating my index file and in the same time I
> try to do some
> searches inside.
> Sometimes I retrieve this error message:
> "\\tradluxstmp01\Ja
t's say
25 of the documents have FF in the color field)
and I do a search for FF...using a HitCollector
I'm iterating over all 100 documents while extracting
values whereas with the regular Hits based search I
would only be iterating over 25?
FFF00 7-F0
1-FF 2-E0 4-EE 8-EEE000 5-00
PIXELS 1
FORMAT JPG
That would be interpreted as FF is the most
dominant of the top 10 most dominant colors and F0
is the least. Would that be a terrible document
structure?
Thanx in advance, especially for wading t
OS: Linux (Suse 9.2)
Java SDK Version: 1.5.6
Lucene Version: 1.9.1
Installed Jars:
lucene-core-1.9.1.jar
lucene-snowball-1.9.1.jar
lucene-spellchecker-1.9.1.jar
Thanks
-JM
James Maes
Software Architect
Is there a technique, using Lucene, to retrieve the remaining index
values from the results of a query?
Here is a better explanation of the question.
I have various fields that have been indexed on a particular
collection of Java POJO's. For example, an Employee object may have
the following fiel
I'm having trouble figuring that out ...
I pronounced "lu-CENE", and I've heard people who
didn't know it pronounce the same way.
But, I got "corrected" into "LOO-sen" one time.
Any concensus?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you for your answer!
> I know the people in Germany pronounce it
ially new
index.) Perhaps a special HTTP command to trigger
that? I don't know.
-James
--- Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> James,
>
> Well, if you want to do things right, then you
> should probably also get
> that IndexSearcher (or any other Java code)
ll not complete sure if this is the best way, but
at least not every new IndexSearcher per request.
-James
--- Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 September 2005 19:21, Patricio
> Galeas wrote:
>
> > I search for a JSP examples of a simple searc
of this exercise -- scalability -- just
want to make sure.
Thanks,
-James
--- markharw00d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's an example I put together to illustrate the
> point.
>
>
> package distance;
>
> import java.io.IOException;
> impo
I think this is probably the closest thing I like to/am able to do now. If I
ever get to do this, I'll share the idea/code and seek review and suggestions.
Thank you very much, Mark, and all others that have helped!
-James
mark harwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the H
--- Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> trimming the post further:
>
> On 9/18/05, James Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >The problem is quite generic, I believe. What I
> like to do is similar to
> > LIA-ch6, i.e. to find a "
See comments below.
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [trimming the post a bit]
>
> On Sep 18, 2005, at 11:51 AM, James Huang wrote:
> > The problem is quite generic, I believe. What I
> like
> > to do is similar to LIA-ch6, i.e. to find a "good
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2005, at 10:24 AM, James Huang wrote:
>
> > --- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Get back to using your DistanceComparatorSource,
> and
> &g
ew DistanceComparatorSource( you need>)),
> SortField.FIELD_SCORE});
Thanks!
Does the order of thest two fields matter? I mean,
with your code, would distance take precedence over
relevance? Anyway, I'll try it out and play with
ordering and such.
-James
>
> Erik
>
_
rmance (and cleaner code).
Previously, I have created a DistanceComparatorSource
(similar to that in LIA-ch6); sorting by distance
works but relevance is lost.
-James
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2005, at 4:10 PM, James Huang wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
I guess I can use HitCollector and implement my own
sorting, right?
Is there a better approach?
--- James Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can sort the search results by distance now. But,
> the relevance is lost.
>
> I like to have the results sorted b
Hi,
I can sort the search results by distance now. But,
the relevance is lost.
I like to have the results sorted by relevance +
distance, i.e., relevance first; for results of
similar relevance, order by distance. How to do that?
Thanks a lot in advance!
-James
--- James Huang <[EM
Yes, "+" is what I missed! Thanks.
Suppose there is a book published by 3 publishers (I
don't know how that works in real world):
// At index time:
doc.add( Field.Keyword("publisher", "Manning") );
doc.add( Field.Keyword("publisher", "SAMS") );
doc.add( Field.Keyword("publisher", "O'Reilly"
d 747, the closest first,
please".
I'll re-read the book/chapter tonight, but look
forward to any expert advises.
Thanks,
-James
--- Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Check out the org.apache.lucene.search.package,
> there are several sort
>
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
