Hi
I last used dotLucene 143 and now I'm wanting to upgrade to 294.
What I've discovered is that there are quite a few changes..
One of them is in respect of Search. Previously one supplied a query and
received a number of hits. I didn't have an issue with preservation of state
so was quite happ
ik
On May 11, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Gwyn Carwardine wrote:
> Hi all, We're using dotLucene (vanilla) in our commercial product
> and we're
> redistributing dotLucene with our product.
>
> What do we need to do in terms of licensing - what notices do we
> need to
&g
Hi all, We're using dotLucene (vanilla) in our commercial product and we're
redistributing dotLucene with our product.
What do we need to do in terms of licensing - what notices do we need to
include and where?
Any help much appreciated
Regards, Gwyn
Have you considered running the .net version (dotLucene)? The converters for
Office and PDF are freely available and there is a cheap commercial IFilter
available for wordperfect files (and many others).
-Gwyn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09
The good bit about Bayesian is that it continuously learns.
The downside is that you have to teach it.
Not quite as simple as a list of rude words.
There's an open source Bayesian mail filter called spambayes
(http://spambayes.sourceforge.net) which may lead you to interesting places.
-Gwyn
-
I want to be able to store items and attachments such that they are treated
as a single document.
On the other hand I want to be able to store them separately; there is not
point in reindexing an attachment if I've simply changed the description.
Here's an example: A system used to track job can
I was happy to take the hit of storing the text twice.
I have created an aggregate field called "CONTENTS" that has all the other
fields concatenated together.
I also created a list of the other fields (because they can vary from doc to
doc) in another field "FIELDLIST"
I search this field and fo
>> Yes I think you're right. On reading the "lucene in action" chapted on
>> highlighting I found it squirreled in the middle of the text. I get
>> the
>> feeling that whilst I have so far found query parser to be the primary
>> method of building queries that this is not ht eprimary method used
lighter.
hope this helps,
Koji
> -Original Message-
> From: Gwyn Carwardine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 6:28 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Highlighter
>
>
> I'm using the .net port of highlighter (1.5) and I
I'm using the .net port of highlighter (1.5) and I notice it doesn't
highlight range or prefix queries.. Is this consistent with the java
version? Only I note my standard reference of www.lucenebook.com seems to
support highlighting.. is this using that same highlighter version (couldn't
find any v
>> 2. How do I search for negative numbers in a range. For example
>> field:[-3 TO
>> 2] ?
>>
>> I don't mind hacking code such that my numbers are indexed as
>> +0001 and
>> -0001 and then I can override the query parser to change my
>> query to
>> [-003 TO +002]. However.. "
eers, Gwyn
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 January 2006 01:54
To:
Cc: Gwyn Carwardine
Subject: Re: Handling of colons in QueryParserTokenManager
Gwyn - this is a question for java-user@ list, I'm answering there.
Perhaps you can write y
I'm only a novice at these things but if I had to do that right now? I'd add
a document that represents that primary key with a value representing the
next available number and everytime I go to do some additions I'd get it,
use the value and then delete and re-add that document with the revised ne
Two queries about ranges:
1. field:[a TO z] does not return the same as field:[z TO a]
I think it should. The standard QueryParser or even the range query should
ascertain the lowest and highest and switch them around if necessary
2. How do I search for negative numbers in a range. For example
14 matches
Mail list logo
