I don’t understand.
If you don’t raise this restriction to a higher value (or to -1), all the text
won’t be extracted so only a subset of the text will be indexed.
Non indexed parts of the text won’t be searchable.
Did I misunderstand your question?
--
David Pilato | Technical Advocate
-mapper-attachments/blob/master/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/index/mapper/attachment/AttachmentMapper.java#L456
<https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch-mapper-attachments/blob/master/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/index/mapper/attachment/AttachmentMapper.java#L456>
--
David
You should ask this on the elasticsearch mailing list.
BTW, look at elasticsearch copy_to feature. Better than _all field.
My 2 cents.
--
David ;-)
Twitter : @dadoonet / @elasticsearchfr / @scrutmydocs
> Le 11 oct. 2014 à 11:31, "haiwei.xie-soulinfo" a
> écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for y
So you probably should ask your question to the Elasticsearch mailing list.
I think that some ES users already scales to x billion docs.
Even if ES is Lucene based, it adds features to scale out (sharding,
routing...).
HTH
--
David ;-)
Twitter : @dadoonet / @elasticsearchfr / @scrutmydocs
Le 5
gs payload to that
url? You can see that I attempted - per various bits of documentation - to
do it in the mappings section above.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:01 PM, David Pilato wrote:
> Did you define mappings for your docs and fields to use that analyzer?
> See:
> http://www.elas
Did you define mappings for your docs and fields to use that analyzer?
See:
http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/reference/api/admin-indices-put-mapping.html
--
David ;-)
Twitter : @dadoonet / @elasticsearchfr / @scrutmydocs
Le 4 janv. 2013 à 22:30, "C. Benson Manica" a écrit :
I have been Goog
Hi Fabio,
Did you consider using Hibernate Search? It's based on Lucene.
It may help you.
David.
Le 9 novembre 2012 à 14:15, Fabio Ebner a écrit
:
> Hi.. can someone help me? i need to integrate LUCENE + SPRING + HIBERNATE
> and don't find any articlhe about this..
>
>
