RE: Query term counting, again...

2012-01-26 Thread David Olson
kemccandless.com On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:36 PM, David Olson wrote: > Hi all, > > After much code and forum searching, I've hit a frustrating point that > should be more obvious. I've trolled through a ton of postings and > messaging on keyword counting and it seems lik

Query term counting, again...

2012-01-25 Thread David Olson
Hi all, After much code and forum searching, I've hit a frustrating point that should be more obvious. I've trolled through a ton of postings and messaging on keyword counting and it seems like all the examples cover single word terms. I've got several code bits I've written that can get me what I

Query building performance

2012-01-16 Thread David Olson
I have a situation where there are users that create n keywords. I'm storing them as individual DB fields for aggregating scores and then building the query from the fields. Is it faster for Lucene to parse a query of terms that are OR'd together or to build it up as a loop of BooleanQuery marked a

Re: extractterms Output

2012-01-13 Thread David Olson
As a follow on, I am using StandardAnalyzer for the doc and query parse. What I get from Luke is a hit, but positions indicate the terms next to each other. Is that how I can get the multi-word fequencies? -David- -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/extractterms-

extractterms Output

2012-01-12 Thread David Olson
Hi all - thanks in advance for any help... I have an app that aggregates keyword performance through incoming messages. A message comes in, I index it, search the index, and the output the performance. The two things I'm playing with are either parse the output from searcher.explain() or iterating