Stop words are never indexed; you may need to empty your stop list.
Luke (open-source w/code available) can browse and re-create documents
in indexes using their terms already. Compare that to the original to
see if you are satisfied.
-Original Message-
From: David Linde [mailto:davidli
hings like warming searchers, indexing
additional documents, or filling FieldCache in parallel.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: David Fertig [mailto:dfer...@cymfony.com]
>
much the answer I
was searching for: lucene alone is able to manage such a big index.
which kind of problems do you have with the parallel searchers? I'm going to
build my index in the next couple of weeks if you want we can confront our
data
thanks again
Luca
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 6
Actually I've been bitten by an still-unresolved issue with the parallel
searchers and recommend a MultiReader instead.
We have a couple billion docs in our archives as well. Breaking them up by day
worked well for us, but you'll need to do something.
-Original Message-
From: Luca Ronda
I noticed there is still no JIRA ticket for this, do we have any type on
consensus on how this issue will/will not be resolved?
If MultiSearcher and and MultiReader do not give the same results, I would
think one would be considered "broken" and/or possibly "unfixable". Is
MultiSearcher goin
s Policeman
>> Bremen, Germany
>>
>> - Reply message -----
>> Von: "Ian Lea"
>> Datum: Mo., Nov. 8, 2010 12:45
>> Betreff: Search returning documents matching a NOT range
>> An:
>> Cc: "David Fertig"
>>
>>
>&
27;re
getting what's in the index
(and thus being searched) rather than wha's stored in the document.
Luke might get you there faster/easier
Best
Erick
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:18 PM, David Fertig
wrote:
> Ian,
> Thank you for getting back to me. No, I do not get a bogus
OT range
Do you get the bogus hit on the small index if search that index
alone? Are you positive it only holds the one doc? Loading the one
doc into a new RAM based index in the test would prove it.
You are more likely to get help if post a self-contained example -
people can see everything rel
You can use a query parser to parse your text query into the appropriate query
objects.
-Original Message-
From: Alain Camus [mailto:a...@ngi.be]
Sent: Friday, November 5, 2010 11:26 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RangeQuery with multiple ranges ?
Hello list,
I'm new to l
I have an active lucene implementation that has been in place for a
couple years and was recently upgraded to the 3.02 branch. We are now
occasionally seeing documents returned from searches that should not be
returned. I have reduced the code and indexes to the smallest set
possible where I can st
Hello. Hopefully this is the correct forum. I am currently using
release 2.3.2 as my stable release, but have tried this 2.4 as well.
I have 4 threads indexing documents into separate indexes and then
merging them into a larger master index.
If the master index is previously corrupted (suc
11 matches
Mail list logo
