ng field, boolean negate))
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: David Carlton
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 4:27 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: handling nonexistent fields in an index
>
>
> I have a bunch of Lucene indices l
field, *) will have
good performance if field only takes a small number of values.
--
David Carlton
carl...@sumologic.com
ache.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
David Carlton
carl...@sumologic.com
ucene 4.0 (that can only read indexs >= 3.0).
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Carlton [mailto:carl...@sumologic.com]
>
input.) Are there
intermediate versions that we should try, e.g. 3.0.3 -> 3.4.0 -> 3.5.0
instead of going straight from 3.0.3 to 3.5.0?
If it matters: the one unusual Lucene usage that we have is that we've
written our own Tokenizer.
Thanks for any pointers that people have.
--
David Carlton
carl...@sumologic.com
