Re: handling nonexistent fields in an index

2013-07-03 Thread David Carlton
ng field, boolean negate)) > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: David Carlton > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 4:27 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: handling nonexistent fields in an index > > > I have a bunch of Lucene indices l

handling nonexistent fields in an index

2013-07-03 Thread David Carlton
field, *) will have good performance if field only takes a small number of values. -- David Carlton carl...@sumologic.com

Re: [Bulk] RE: any tips for upgrading Lucene 3.0.3 -> 3.5.0?

2012-01-20 Thread David Carlton
ache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- David Carlton carl...@sumologic.com

Re: any tips for upgrading Lucene 3.0.3 -> 3.5.0?

2012-01-19 Thread David Carlton
ucene 4.0 (that can only read indexs >= 3.0). > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Carlton [mailto:carl...@sumologic.com] >

any tips for upgrading Lucene 3.0.3 -> 3.5.0?

2012-01-19 Thread David Carlton
input.) Are there intermediate versions that we should try, e.g. 3.0.3 -> 3.4.0 -> 3.5.0 instead of going straight from 3.0.3 to 3.5.0? If it matters: the one unusual Lucene usage that we have is that we've written our own Tokenizer. Thanks for any pointers that people have. -- David Carlton carl...@sumologic.com