Re: JCC build fails with Python>=3.8

2021-11-18 Thread David Allouche
python%s.%s' % (sys.version_info[0:2])] kwds["force_shared"] = True# requires jcc/patches/patch.43 elif platform in IMPLIB_LFLAGS: jcclib = 'jcc%s%s.lib' %(py_version_suffix, debug and '_d' or '') > On 18 Nov 2021

Re: JCC build fails with Python>=3.8

2021-11-18 Thread David Allouche
python%s.%s' % (sys.version_info[0:2])] kwds["force_shared"] = True# requires jcc/patches/patch.43 elif platform in IMPLIB_LFLAGS: jcclib = 'jcc%s%s.lib' %(py_version_suffix, debug and '_d' or '') > On 18 Nov 2021

Re: JCC build fails with Python>=3.8

2021-11-18 Thread David Allouche
python%s.%s' % (sys.version_info[0:2])] kwds["force_shared"] = True# requires jcc/patches/patch.43 elif platform in IMPLIB_LFLAGS: jcclib = 'jcc%s%s.lib' %(py_version_suffix, debug and '_d' or '') > On 18 Nov 2021

Re: JCC build fails with Python>=3.8

2021-11-18 Thread David Allouche
python%s.%s' % (sys.version_info[0:2])] kwds["force_shared"] = True# requires jcc/patches/patch.43 elif platform in IMPLIB_LFLAGS: jcclib = 'jcc%s%s.lib' %(py_version_suffix, debug and '_d' or '') > On 18 Nov 2021

JCC build fails with Python>=3.8

2021-11-18 Thread David Allouche
Hello, https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/PYLUCENE/issues/PYLUCENE-52 Currently porting a code base to Python3, I have found about this issue. If I understand correctly, that means that pylucene cannot be built on Python

Re: Live index upgrading

2019-06-21 Thread David Allouche
The bottom line for me, is that I am not going to upgrade to Lucene8 for a while. The index migration would either cause a service interruption, or would require a little while to implement. I have more urgent technical debt to deal with. > On 21 Jun 2019, at 19:11, David Allouche wr

Re: Live index upgrading

2019-06-21 Thread David Allouche
omputed index from them. Yes, Solr/ES can add database-like > behavior where they hold the true original source of the document and use > that to rebuild Lucene indices over time. But Lucene really is just a > "search index" and we need to be free to make important improvem

Re: Live index upgrading

2019-06-21 Thread David Allouche
om scratch on whatever version of Lucene > you want to use. > > Best, > Erick > > > >> On Jun 17, 2019, at 8:41 AM, David Allouche wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I use Lucene with PyLucene on a public-facing web application. We have a >> moder

Live index upgrading

2019-06-17 Thread David Allouche
Hello, I use Lucene with PyLucene on a public-facing web application. We have a moderately large index (~24M documents, ~11GB index data), with a constant stream of new documents. I recently upgraded to PyLucene 7. When trying to test the new release of PyLucene 8, I encountered an IndexForma