Jeff,
I would suggest not deleting documents off the back of the index unless you can
optimize your index regularly. (Depending on your volume, this could be every
day or once a week)
I would suggest having two indexes, one that is "this" week and one that is
"last" week and a multi-index searc
Shelly:
You wouldn't necessarily have to use a multisearcher. A suggested alternative
is:
- shard into 10 indices. If you need the concept of a date range search, I
would assign the documents to the shard by date, otherwise random assignment is
fine.
- have a pool of IndexSearchers for each in
We have two instances of a search system containing 40 million documents -
identical jvm versions, lucene jars, and our code. One is running on local
disks. The other is on a SAN. The instance on local disks consistently far
outperforms the SAN instance.
And I'd second Uwe's sentiments. An in
Paul:
My first suggestion would be to update your JVM to the latest version (or at
least .14). There were several garbage collection related issues resolved in
version 10 - 13 (especially dealing with large heaps).
Next, your IndexWriter parameters would help figure out why you are using so
mu
Hi Jamie,
I would appreciate if you could provide details on the hardware/OS you are
running this system on and what kind of search response time you are getting.
As well as how you add email data to your index.
Thanks,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Jamie [mailto:ja...@stimulussoft.com
09 at 1:41 PM, Dan OConnor wrote:
> All:
>
> I would like to be able to control when an index merge happens (by wall
> clock time) so that merges do not occur in the middle of the business day.
>
> I have a lucene system based on v2.3.2 and we add a couple hundred thousand
> d
e
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Dan OConnor wrote:
> All:
>
> I would like to be able to control when an index merge happens (by wall clock
> time) so that merges do not occur in the middle of the business day.
>
> I have a lucene system based on v2.3.2 and we add a
Thanks for the feed back Chris.
Can you (or someone else on the list) tell me about the IndexMerge tool?
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 6:46 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help to det
riginal Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 6:38 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: simultaneous indexing and searching causing intermitently long
searches.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Dan OConnor wrote:
>
All,
I have a several questions regarding query response time and I would appreciate
any help that can be provided.
We have a system that indexes approximately 200,000 documents per day at a
fairly constant rate and holds them in a cfs-style file system directory index
for 8 days. The index is
All:
We are using java lucene 2.3.2 to index a fairly large number of documents
(roughly 400,000 per day). We have divided the time history into various depths.
Our first stage covers 8 days and our next stage covers 22. The index directory
for the first stage is approximately 20G when fully op
11 matches
Mail list logo
