Re: How to improve performance of large numbers of successive searches?

2008-04-16 Thread Chris McGee
). That way, you bypass all the search logic. But a simpler way might be ConstantScoreQuery. But first I'd just try a HitCollector, possibly with a ConstantScoreQuery and then. But, again, what leads you to believe that performance is not adequate yet? What is your target? Best Erick On Mon,

Re: How to improve performance of large numbers of successive searches?

2008-04-14 Thread Chris McGee
2000 hits" taking "well over a minute" is unacceptable? After all, that's 2,000,000 documents you're analyzing. A minute seems reasonable. What problem are you *really* trying to solve? or is this just a load test? Best Erick On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Chris McGe

Re: How to improve performance of large numbers of successive searches?

2008-04-14 Thread Chris McGee
each document. Assuming that I need to gather all result documents each time, what are the advantages of using a HitCollector over Hits? Is there some way that I can load the index portion of the lucene data storage into RAM without loading everything into a RAMDirectory? Thanks, Chris McGee &

How to improve performance of large numbers of successive searches?

2008-04-10 Thread Chris McGee
based on frequency or weights I need to retrieve all of the results anyway. Any help with this would be great. Thanks, Chris McGee