ne
(probably a committer) who /really understands/ the low-level stuff and
would be able to help. These are serious people (I've looked them up)
and I would expect you would be paid for your time. Please contact me
off-list if you might be able to help.
Cheers
Charlie
P.S. hope to see s
I think you'll need a SpanQuery with the inOrder flag set:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_8_1/core/org/apache/lucene/search/spans/SpanNearQuery.html
Charlie
On 17/03/2021 10:30, Vlad Smirnovskiy wrote:
Hello!
I`d like to do something like that: When I add a document and some text is
viour.
Best
Charlie
Kindly support us.
Looking forward for the response
Best regards,
Anuradha Rajaram
--
Charlie Hull
Flax - Open Source Enterprise Search
tel/fax: +44 (0)8700 118334
mobile: +44 (0)7767 825828
web: www.flax.
Hi Steve,
Sorry for my late reply, your answer didn't reach me!
My account name is : CharliePicorini
Kind regards,
Charlie
Dear Lucene Team,
Please add me to the contributorsGroup so that I can add IntraCherche which
is actually based on Lucene.
Kind regards,
ll look for the full email address. What is the draw back of
using the quoted version? Is the performance worse doing this? How much
worse? I'm not sure how quoted searches are implemented so it's hard for
me to gauge what the draw back is.
Thanks
Charlie
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:23
This is a pretty simple question to answer, but I have customers asking me
how this is suppose to work and I'm having trouble explaining it. I have
an app that indexes emails so there are plenty of email addresses in there.
Reading the StandardAnalyzer javadoc it says it "recognizes" email
addres
oved and I switched
to passing in the IndexReader.
So as usual it was pilot error. It was never Lucene's problem just me not
be careful when switching to new methods. I'm sorry Lucene you are still
my favorite library. :-)
Thanks again.
Charlie
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Ian Le
ndexWriter and IndexReader in order to make changes
visible, and it worked great in 2.4. But I see leaking in 3.1.
Charlie
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Ian Lea wrote:
> It's hard, impossible for me, to figure out from this what your
> problem might be, Multiple indexes, Mult
;ve
double checked that close() was definitely being called with my logs.
Again this code was the same in 2.4 and it didn't leak files, but under
3.1 it leaked files.
Thanks for you help,
Charlie
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Ian Lea wrote:
> Something that did change at some point, can
the handles being counted as being
open?
I have a single IndexWriter and a single IndexSearcher open on a single CFS
directory. The writer is only used by a single thread, but IndexSearcher
can be shared among several threads. I still think something has changed
in 3.1 that's causing this.
different is 3.1.
Furthermore, when new documents are pulled in through the
old mechanism the open file count continues to rise. Over a 24 hours
period it's grown by +296 files, but only 10 or 12 documents indexed.
So is this a known issue? Should I upgrade to newer version to fix this?
Than
You can always index into RAMDirectory for speed then synchronize those
changes to the disk by adding the RAMDirectory to a FSDirectory at some
point. Here is a simple example of how to do that:
public void save( RAMDirectory ram, File dir ) {
FSDirectory fs = FSDirectory.open( dir );
x that I do close periodically, and
its not growing like this one.
I've read some posts about using commit() instead of close() in situations
like this because its faster performance. However, commit() just flushes
to disk rather than flushing and optimizing like close(). Not sure
commit() is what I need or not. Any suggestions?
Thanks
Charlie
o I need to worry about indexing with a lower
precision than milliseconds as I did when in using RangeQuery? Finally will
queries that are parsed from strings be converted into NumericRangeQuery
when the field is a NumericField? Or do I have to handle that?
Charlie
the query, sort, and filter in a efficient way?
Charlie
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I'm trying to reimplement a feature I had under 2.x in 3.x. I have a
> : feature where a zip file for all of the documents returned by a search
> can
> : be
to a
file. I thought that's essentially what a Collector is, being an interface
that is called back whenever it encounters a Document that matches a query.
Any elaboration on that?
Charlie
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Eddie Drapkin wrote:
> On 9/16/2011 11:30 AM, Charlie Hubbard wr
extract all of
the documents matched by that search. I've been trying to understand how
Collectors work, but I'm not sure I see the connection. If I wanted to walk
over each document that matches the search and save the contents to the zip
how would that best be done?
Thanks
Charlie
ene-from-2-2-to-2-9-to-3-1
If you want the karma points feel free to post on stackoverflow. If not
posting here is fine too.
Thanks
Charlie
ch performance continue to be
acceptable if I load up documents with many fields like this?
Is there an upper limit on the number of fields comprising a document, and
if so what is it?
Or, is there some way to make my original approach work after all?
Regards and thanks,
Charlie
ucene-1.4.3-src.zip extraced it, installed ANT, installed
the newest JDK 1.5.0_09 and then I run ant.
The file is compiled without any error, but when I run my Index-Script I get
this error:
org/apache/lucene/analysis/StopAnalyzer (Unsupported major.minor version
49.0)
So please help me.
br
Charlie
? (not the proprietary one you have mentioned.) I am currently
looking at the package, not much doc to read though.
--
Best regards,
Charlie
---
Monday, July 24, 2006, 12:44:16 PM, you wrote:
> The "surround" query parser in Lucene's contrib area implement
. I had only one
compiler class and never feel good about it:)
--
Best regards,
Charlie
---
Monday, July 24, 2006, 2:04:35 AM, you wrote:
: >> Would anyone give me a hint regarding the natural language expression
: >> of the following span query?
> :
x, field:hundred], 0, true),
spanNear([field:seven, field:hundred], 0, true)]), spanOr([field:seven,
field:six])], 100, true)
what's its equivalence in natural language?
(something we can write in one line and can be parsed by QueryParser)
(if
Hi Edgar,
Are there any technical reports explaining your design and
implementation of LM on Lucene? Or what source files are exactly "LM
extension"?
--
Best regards,
Charlie
---
Friday, May 26, 2006, 7:36:14 AM, you wrote:
> Hi Edgar,
> While doing the integration/updatin
25 matches
Mail list logo