Re: Lucene 2.9 RC1 now available for testing

Thank you, Lucene 2.9 is a great release... I have one issue so far - I cannot find the contrib/analyzers jars, only the sources are present. Bogdan On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello Lucene users, > > On behalf of the

Re: removing norms

Yes, but the norms will be loaded at the search time.. I want to remove them because I don't have enough memory. Bogdan On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Karl Wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 12 sep 2008 kl. 12.25 skrev Bogdan Ghidireac: > >> I have a large inde

removing norms

Hi, I have a large index and I want to remove the norms from a field. Is there a way to do this without reindexing everything ? Thank you, Bogdan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: CheckIndex tool issues

;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Woops! You are right, this is a silly bug in the CheckIndex tool. It > is not > > properly taking into account deletions. I will open an issue & fix it. > > > > Thanks for testing & reporting this, and sor

CheckIndex tool issues

Hi, I tried to use the CheckIndex tool (the latest svn code) and I was surprised to notice that all my indexes from production (around 30) are corrupt. This is highly unlikely because they were running for about one year and I had no exception during search so far. One recurring pattern I observe

Re: index conversion

existing one and check the results. Bogdan Doron > > "Bogdan Ghidireac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/09/2007 15:38:51: > > > Hi, > > > > I have an optimized compound index and I want to transform it to > standard > > format. I tried to optimize

index conversion

Hi, I have an optimized compound index and I want to transform it to standard format. I tried to optimize using the standard format but I had no luck.. Is there another way ? I don't want to re-index because it will take several days. IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(args[0], new StandardAnal

Re: First search is slow after updating index .. subsequent searches very fast

Otis, I am not familiar with the 'dd trick' to warm up the index. Can you please explain it ? Bogdan On 12/20/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To populate FieldCache, the number of matches doesn't matter. There is no need to be scrimy there - you don't really save anything by