: That kinda would be the point - "contents:germany" would get the
same
: fileIDs, but "contents:germany title:medicine" would (hopefully)
give
: us a more specific query.
when you say "contents:germany title:medicine" i'm not sure if you are
assuming that both clauses are mandatory or option
If the old index is optimized then you might be able to iterate
through
all the docs in your old index (sorted by doc id) and for each
iteration
add the corresponding doc to the new index so it has a matching doc
id.
The idea being that after searching on one index you could use the doc
id
On Jun 9, 2006, at 2:10 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: 2. Recreating the index from scratch will require the moving of the
: heavens and the earth.
:
: My crazy idea - can we add new Documents to the index with the
Fields
: we wish to add, and duplicate file IDs? i.e. an entry for file ID
Fo
Hi,
I've been handed a legacy index containing Documents with two Fields;
one is a file ID, the other is contents of the file. The contents
field was added using UnStored. Now, we want to add fields. Oh, the
humanity!
I've looked through the archives, and previously suggested methods
wo
