Hi
Apologies up front if this question has been asked before.
I have a document which contains a field that stores an untokenized value such
as TEST_TYPE. The analyser used is StandardAnalyzer and I pass the same
analyzer into the query. I perform the following query : fieldName:TEST_*,
howe
, Ian Lea wrote:
>>
>>> What sort of ranges are you trying to use? Maybe you could store a
>>> separate field, just for these queries, with some normalized form of
>>> the ids, with all numbers padded out to the same length etc.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ian
as you expect.
>>>
>>> I'm not clear what you mean by XDF-123 but if you've got
>>>
>>> AAA-123
>>> AAA-124
>>> ...
>>> ABC-123
>>> ABC-234
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> then you'll be fine. If
es a Collator but note the
> performance warning in the javadocs.
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
> wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I was wondering whether I can use TermRangeQuery for my use case. I have a
>> colle
note the
> performance warning in the javadocs.
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
> wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I was wondering whether I can use TermRangeQuery for my use case. I have a
>> collection of ids (r
Hi All
I was wondering whether I can use TermRangeQuery for my use case. I have a
collection of ids (represented as XDF-123) and I would like to do a search for
all the ids (might be in the range of 1) and for each matching id I want to
get the corresponding data that is stored in the inde
indexwriter OR commit the changes
> before you can see your changes, see IndexWriter.close/commit
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> I have a list of batch tasks that need t
Hi
I have a list of batch tasks that need to be executed. Each batch contains
1000 documents and basically I use a RAMDirectory based index writer, and at
the end of adding 1000 documents to the memory i perform the following:
ramWriter.commit();
indexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize(ramW
s wrote:
> Can you post the full exception? And also the log output from
> IndexWriter.setInfoStream.
>
> Mike
>
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Apologies for re sending this email but I was just wondering if
Hi
Apologies for re sending this email but I was just wondering if any one might
be able to advise on the below. I'm not sure if I've provided enough info.
Again any help would be appreciated.
Amin
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Aug 2010, at 20:00, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
Hi
I am currently building an application whereby there is a remote index server
(yes it probably does sound like Solr :)) and users use my API to send
documents to the indexing server for indexing. The 2 methods primarily used is
add and commit. So the user can send requests for documents to
Hi
I am looking at handling special characters in the query as using certain
characters cause an exception. I looked at QueryParser.escape(..) to handle
this. It works to a certain extent for example using '!' doesn't cause an
exception. However when I use a wildcard then the wildcard is ignored.
Hi
Sorry for not getting back to you. Been swamped with stuff and work and
home. Just managed to check my lucene emails!
You are right i made some silly mistakes with the testcase and have updated
accordingly. The test is still failing but the properties are set
correctly:
public class Underwr
Hi
Thanks for your reponse. Here is the following testcase:
public class UnderwriterReferenceTest {
private Directory directory;
private Analyzer analyzer;
private IndexSearcher indexSearcher;
private IndexWriter indexWriter;
private Document layerDocumentA;
@Before
-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
> I include a testcase to show what I am trying to do. Testcase number 3
> fails.
>
> Thanks
> Amin
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am looking at applying a security fi
Hi
I include a testcase to show what I am trying to do. Testcase number 3
fails.
Thanks
Amin
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking at applying a security filter for our lucene document and I
> was wondering if I could get feedback on
Hi,
I am looking at applying a security filter for our lucene document and I was
wondering if I could get feedback on whether the solution I have come up
with. Firstly I will explain the scenario and followed by the proposed
solution:
We have a concept of a Layer which is a project whereby a br
Hi
I have recently created an indexing reference project using Spring
Integration. May not help you with what you're doing but it might be
interesting for creating asynchronous indexing using JMS.
http://code.google.com/p/lucene-indexing-with-si/
Cheers
Amin
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:53 AM,
ouple of weeks but i
> haven't seen a lot of test cases so far.
>
> Maybe the contribs are a good place to start from.
>
> simon
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
> wrote:
> > Thanks for your replies. I have checked out trunk and have st
Thanks for your replies. I have checked out trunk and have started looking
at what I can do. Any more suggestions as usual always welcome.
Thanks all!
Amin
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : that you use. Also, we are nearing 2.9 release, so it would
> : be great t
gs or
anything.
I am currently developing a reference project for using Spring Integration
for Lucene indexing and I have done some other projects one of them being an
Integration between GigaSpaces and Hibernate Search.
Kind Regards
Amin Mohammed-Coleman
I've been working on a indexing solution using Spring integration and
lucene. the example project uses jms to create work items (index add or
update) and then a service that polls for work to do. I should have this
complete soon and will be putting it on google code. Not much of help right
now but
Hi
I think you might want to look at Hibernate Search. You can use projections
which basically store instance fields in the index. It does not store the
object in a serialised form in the index. It holds a reference (id) to the
persistant entity.
Cheers
Amin
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Er
will throw LockObtainFailedException, In this case, Unlock it and Open the
> writer again.
> >
> > Regards
> > Ganesh
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Amin Mohammed-Coleman"
> > To: ;
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 5:3
9 PM, Ganesh wrote:
> > Yes. Single IndexWriter could be maintained in a App and it could be
> closed when the App is shutdown.
> >
> > Regards
> > Ganesh
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Amin Mohammed-Coleman"
> >
Hi
This question has probably been asked before so apologies for asking it
again. Just to confirm that it is ok to use a single index writer in a web
application and only close that single instance on application shutdown? As
the indexwriter is thread safe there is no need for any external
synch
Hi
Sorry for sending the below..what I meant to say was is there any
documentation that I can be pointed to with using lucene and rsync? I been
up since 2am so brain slowing down really quickly...
Cheers
Amin
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
>
> T
Amin,
> >>
> >> Have a look at Solr, it may be what you are after:
> >> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
> >>
> >> Otis
> >> --
> >> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
> >>
> >>
> >>
> &g
Hi
I am prototyping the following situation:
1) Multiple nodes in a cluster
2) Each node has a local index
3) Search requests are maded against the local index
4) Index updates are sent to a JMS where a master process adds document to
index
5) Each node is configured to check whether the local ind
Hi
I'm looking at Hadoop and Katta and I was wondering if some may be able
clarify the following:
1) Is Katta replacing the Hadoop Lucene contribution
2) Are people still using Hadoop Lucene to perform indexing
Cheers
Amin
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
rge.net
>
> -Tarandeep
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman >wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > we are thinking of implementing a solution like this. All nodes on the
> > cluster has a local index from which searches are performed. Once an
>
Hi
we are thinking of implementing a solution like this. All nodes on the
cluster has a local index from which searches are performed. Once an update
on the index needs to happen the work is sent to a queue where there is a
master who is responsible for updating the central index. The master is
Hi All
This may not be a question for this mailing list but i wasn't sure where to
start. Please accept my apologies if anyone thinks that this is not the
appropriate place for this question.
I am currently working on building a proof of concept search solution for my
company using Lucene and Hi
Will there any videocasts/presentation notes? I would so so so so like to
turn up for that! Hope it's great!
Cheers
Amin
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Bradford Stephens <
bradfordsteph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone! We (finally) have space secured (it's a tough task!):
> University o
Are you using an object relational mapping tool like Hibernate? if you are
you could use hibernate search to index your persistent entities and then
use luke to inspect the indexes. There may other ways of doing it I
guess. Just a thought.
Cheers
Amin
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Christo
I would love to come but I'm afraid I'm stuck in rainy old England :(
Amin
On 18 Apr 2009, at 01:08, Bradford Stephens
wrote:
OK, we've got 3 people... that's enough for a party? :)
Surely there must be dozens more of you guys out there... c'mon,
accelerate your knowledge! Join us in Seat
he general approach is. Also
whenever the indexes change should I clear the spell index and start again?
Once again apologies for bringing this up.
Cheers
Amin
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
> Another thing that I was wondering is how to apply the con
Hi
Another thing that I was wondering is how to apply the construction of the
spell index. Where is the most appropriate place to create the spell index?
For example:
IndexReader spellReader = IndexReader.open(fsDirectory1);
IndexReader spellReader2 = IndexReader.open(fsDirectory2);
MultiRead
Hi
I have been playing around with the SpellChecker class and so far it looks
really good. While developing a testcase to show it working I came across a
couple of issues which I have resolved but I'm not certain if this is the
correct approach. I would therefore be grateful if anyone could tell
Hi
I was going to suggest looking at hibernate search. It comes with
event listeners that modify your indexes when the persistent entity
changes. It use lucene under the hood so if you need to access lucene
the you can.
Indexing can be done sync or async and the documentation shows how to
Hi
I was wondering if soemthing like LingPipe or Gate (for text extraction)
might be an idea? I've started looking at it and I'm just thinking it may
be applicable (I maybe wrong).
Cheers
Amin
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Hi MFM,
>
> This comes down to a preprocess
s worked.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Amin Mohammed-Coleman [mailto:ami...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:43 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: ;
Subject: Re: Performance t
Hi
How do you expose a pagination without a customized hit collector. The
multi searcher does not expose a method for hit collector and sort.
Maybe this is not an issue for people ...
Cheers
Amin
On 20 Mar 2009, at 17:25, "Uwe Schindler" wrote:
Why not use a MultiSearcher an all single
e.
Cheers
Amin
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
>
> If I choose to subclass the default similarity, do I need to apply the
> same subclassed Similarity to IndexReader, IndexWriter and IndexSearcher?
>
> I am interested in doing the bel
Hi
If I choose to subclass the default similarity, do I need to apply the same
subclassed Similarity to IndexReader, IndexWriter and IndexSearcher?
I am interested in doing the below:
Similarity sim = new DefaultSimilarity() {
public float lengthNorm(String field, int numTerms) {
if(field
Hi
Please ignore the problem I raised. User error !
Sorry
Amin
On 19 Mar 2009, at 09:41, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
wrote:
Hi
I've implemented the solution using the PageHitCounter from the link
and I have noticed that in certain instances I get a 0 score for
queries like "d
Hi
I've implemented the solution using the PageHitCounter from the link and I
have noticed that in certain instances I get a 0 score for queries like
"document OR aspectj".
has anyone else experienced this?
Cheers
Amin
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrot
ery,filter,pageHitCollector)
I intend to use comparators to do the sorting and use collections.sort().
I would be grateful for any feedback on whether this is a good approach.
Cheers
Amin
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi Erick
>
> I&#x
d something off
> on Sunday that I don't really understand well enough
>
> Sorry 'bout that
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman >wrote:
>
> > HI Erick
> > Thanks for your reply, glad to see I'm not the only person
>
Mar 15, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Seid Mohammed
> wrote:
> >
> >> that is exactly my question
> >> how can I do that?
> >>
> >> thanks a lot
> >> Seid M
> >>
> >> On 3/15/09, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> >> > Why don't you c
/search/Filter.html
> >
> filter,
> int n,
> Sort
> <
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_1/api/org/apache/lucene/search/Sort.html
> >
> sort)
>throws IOException
> <http://java.sun.com/j2se/1
Why don't you create a Lucene document that represents a Person and then
index the fields name, age, phone number, etc. Search on the name and then
get the corresponding phone number from the search.
Cheers
Amin
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Seid Mohammed wrote:
> I want to Index Person_Nam
Hi
I'm looking at trying to implement pagination for my search project.
I've been google-ing for a solution. So far no luck. I've seen
implementations of HitCollector which looks promising, however my
search method has to completely change.
For example I'm currently using the following:
Ok. I tried to apply the patch(s) and completely messed it up (user
error). Is there a full example of the highlighter that is available that I
can apply and test?
Cheers
Amin
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Absolutely! I have received considerable help f
ow by pulling the patch attached to the issue & testing it
> yourself. If you do so, please report back! This is how Lucene improves.
>
> I'm hoping we can include it in 2.9...
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2009, at 6:35 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
> Sw
Sweet! When will this highlighter be available? Can I use this now?
Cheers!
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
> I think that would be good.
>>
>
> I'll open an issue.
ighlighted terms, etc.).
Maybe we should do the same for highlighter?
Mike
Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
I did the following:
highlighter.setMaxDocCharsToAnalyze(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
which works.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman >wrote:
JIRA updated. Includes new t
I did the following:
highlighter.setMaxDocCharsToAnalyze(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
which works.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> JIRA updated. Includes new testcase which shows highlighter not working as
> expected.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 a
JIRA updated. Includes new testcase which shows highlighter not working as
expected.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have found that it is not issue with POI. I extracted text using PoI but
> differenlty and the term is extracted properly.
le on JIRA. Currently on a
cramped train!
Cheers
On 11 Mar 2009, at 18:11, markharw00d wrote:
If you can supply a Junit test that recreates the problem I think we
can start to make progress on this.
Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
Hi
Apologies for re sending this mail. Just wondering if a
JIRA raised:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1559
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
>
> Did both attachments not come through?
>
> Cheers
> Amin
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:52 AM, mark harwood wrote:
>
&g
sometimes for other files.
>
>
> Cheers
> Amin
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, markharw00d
> wrote:
>
> If you can supply a Junit test that recreates the problem I think we can
> start to make progress on this.
>
>
>
> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
n this.
>
>
>
> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Apologies for re sending this mail. Just wondering if anyone has
>> experienced the below. I'm not sure if this could happen due nature of
>> document. It does seem strange one term search returns summar
ng this so I can code around this if is normal.
Apologies again for re sending this mail
Cheers
Amin
Sent from my iPhone
On 9 Mar 2009, at 07:50, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
Hi
I am seeing some strange behaviour with the highlighter and I'm
wondering if anyone else is experie
but no highlighted summary. However
if I search using "aspectj" I get the same doucment with highlighted
summary.
Just to mentioned I do rewrite the original query before performing the
highlighting.
I'm not sure what i'm missing here. Any help would be appreciated.
Hi
Got it working! Thanks again for your help!
Amin
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Thanks! The final piece that I needed to do for the project!
> Cheers
>
> Amin
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
>> >
Thanks! The final piece that I needed to do for the project!
Cheers
Amin
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > cool. i will use compression and store in index. is there anything
> > special
> > i need to for decompressing the text? i presume i can just do
> > doc.get("cont
turday, March 07, 2009 12:46 PM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Lucene Highlighting and Dynamic Summaries
> >
> > It depends :)
> >
> > It's a trade-off. If storing is not prohibitive, I recommend that as
> > it makes life easier
ael McCandless wrote:
>
>
>> You should look at contrib/highlighter, which does exactly this.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>> I am currently indexing documents (pdf, ms word, etc) that are uploaded,
>>> these
Hi
I am currently indexing documents (pdf, ms word, etc) that are uploaded,
these documents can be searched and what the search returns to the user are
summaries of the documents. Currently the summaries are extracted when
indexing the file (summary constructed by taking the first 10 lines of the
call
> maybeReopen() in get, unless at the time you first create SearcherManager
> the Directories each have an empty index in them.
>
> Mike
>
> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
> Hi
>> Here is the code that I am using, I've modified the get() method to
>> inc
that search will not see the
> newly opened readers, but the next search will.
>
> I'm just thinking that since you see no results with get() alone, debug
> that case first. Then put back the maybeReopen().
>
> Can you post your full code at this point?
>
>
> Mike
>
>
esn't make sense. I maybe missing something here.
Cheers
Amin
On 2 Mar 2009, at 15:48, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
I'm seeing some interesting behviour when i do get() first followed
by maybeReopen then there are no documents in the directory
(directory that i am interested in.
ut the numDocs() of each IndexReader you get from the SearcherManager?
>
> Something is wrong and it's best to explain it...
>
>
> Mike
>
> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
> Nope. If i remove the maybeReopen the search doesn't work. It only works
>> when i c
gt; get() before maybeReopen() should simply let you search based on the
> searcher before reopening.
>
> If you just do get() and don't call maybeReopen() does it work?
>
>
> Mike
>
> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
> I noticed that if i do the get() before the maybe
" +
>> stopWatch.getTotalTimeMillis() + " ms");
>>
>> return summaryList.toArray(new Summary[] {});
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope this makes sense...thanks again!
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Amin
>>
>&g
t; LOGGER.debug("Initialising multi searcher ");
>>
>> documentSearcherManagers = new
>> DocumentSearcherManager[directories.size()];
>>
>> for (int i = 0; i < directories.size() ;i++) {
>>
>> Directory directory = directories.get(i);
&
> SearcherManager (from your Directory instances). You don't need any
> searchers during initialize.
>
> Is DocumentSearcherManager the same as SearcherManager (just renamed)?
>
> The release method is wrong -- you're calling .get() and then
> immediately release
your help!
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> This is not quite right -- you should only create SearcherManager once
> (per Direcotry) at startup/app load, not with every search request.
>
> And I don't see releas
d call maybeReopen(), and then call get() and gather each
> IndexSearcher instance into a new array. Then, make a new
> MultiSearcher (opposite of what I said before): while that creates a
> small amount of garbage, it'll keep your code simpler (good
> tradeoff).
>
> Mike
>
&
o other thread is reopening
> #E Finish reopen and notify other threads
> #F Reopen searcher if there are changes
> #G Check index version and reopen, warm, swap if needed
> #H Returns current searcher
> #I Release searcher
> #J Swaps currentSearcher to new searcher
>
sorrry I added
release(multiSearcher);
instead of multiSearcher.close();
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
> I've now done the following:
>
> public Summary[] search(final SearchRequest searchRequest)
> throwsSearchExecutionExceptio
>
> It's best to call this method from a single BG "warming" thread, in which
> case it would not need its own synchronization.
>
> But, to be safe, I'll add internal synchronization to it. You can't simply
> put synchronized in front of the method, since
();
assert newReader != currentSearcher.getIndexReader();
IndexSearcher newSearcher = new IndexSearcher(newReader);
warm(newSearcher);
swapSearcher(newSearcher);
}
}
should the above be synchronised?
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> thanks. i w
thanks. i will rewrite..in between giving my baby her feed and playing with
the other child and my wife who wants me to do several other things!
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
> Hi
so
>creating unnecessary garbage; instead, they should be created once
>& reused.
>
> You should consider simply using Solr -- it handles all this logic for
> you and has been well debugged with time...
>
> Mike
>
> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
> The reaso
Forgot to mention that the previous code that i sent was related to facet
search. This is a general search method I have implemented (they can
probably be combined...).
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
> I have modified my search code. Here is the fol
dexreader is
not up to date. When this is set to true the indexsearchers are refreshed.
I would be grateful on your thoughts.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for your help. I will modify my facet search and my other code to
> u
release(currentSearcher);
>currentSearcher = newSearcher;
> }
> }
>
> /*
> #A Current IndexSearcher
> #B Create initial searcher
> #C Implement in subclass to warm new searcher
> #D Call this to reopen searcher if index changed
> #E Returns current searcher
dexSearcher before you switch to it, meaning
>> run
>> a few queries on it before you swap the old one out.
>>
>> M
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman > >wrote:
>>
>> The reason for the indexreader.re
all the IndexReader#close() method. If nothing is pointing at
> the readers they should be garbage collected. Also, you might
> want to warm up your new IndexSearcher before you switch to it, meaning run
> a few queries on it before you swap the old one out.
>
> M
>
>
>
> O
The reason for the indexreader.reopen is because I have a webapp which
enables users to upload files and then search for the documents. If I don't
reopen i'm concerned that the facet hit counter won't be updated.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
ope that made sense...!
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks just what I needed!
>
> Cheers
> Amin
>
>
> On 22 Feb 2009, at 16:11, Marcelo Ochoa wrote:
>
> Hi Amin:
>> Please take a look a this blog post:
>> ht
Hi
Thanks just what I needed!
Cheers
Amin
On 22 Feb 2009, at 16:11, Marcelo Ochoa wrote:
Hi Amin:
Please take a look a this blog post:
http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2007/04/lucene-search-within-search-with.html
Best regards, Marcelo.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
Hi
Sorry to re send this email but I was wondering if I could get some
advice on this.
Cheers
Amin
On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
wrote:
Hi
I am looking at building a faceted search using Lucene. I know that
Solr comes with this built in, however I would like to
Hi
I am looking at building a faceted search using Lucene. I know that Solr
comes with this built in, however I would like to try this by myself
(something to add to my CV!). I have been looking around and I found that
you can use the IndexReader and use TermVectors. This looks ok but I'm not
su
enized content.
>
> Regards
> Ganesh
>
> - Original Message - From: "Amin Mohammed-Coleman" <
> ami...@gmail.com>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 2:00 PM
> Subject: Field.Store.YES Question
>
>
>
> Hi
>>
>> I'm
Hi
I'm probably going to get shot down for asking this simple question.
Although I think I understand the basic concept of Field I feel there is
something that I am missing and I was wondering if someone might help to
clarify.
You can store a field value in an index using Field.Store.YES or if th
al (closed) one is still there.
indexSearchers.add(indexSearch);
}
[EOE] So if you use searchers anywhere from here on, it's got closed
readers in it if you closed any of them.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman >wrote:
Hi
I am trying to get an understa
adds the newly opened searcher to the end of your array.
The
original (closed) one is still there.
indexSearchers.add(indexSearch);
}
[EOE] So if you use searchers anywhere from here on, it's got closed
readers in it if you closed any of them.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:19 PM,
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
