Alright. With all the changes you suggested I am down from 9s to <1s.
Again, many thanks to both of you Erick and Shai!
Regards,
Alex
On 02.06.2011 15:48, Alexander Rosemann wrote:
No worries, I'll keep that in mind now.
In addition I am going to switch to another collector as wel
15:36, Erick Erickson wrote:
Sounds good, just be sure to keep your (now single) searcher open! Also,
be sure to measure queries after a while. The first few queries will fill up
caches etc, so the time should improve after the first few.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Alexander Ros
bugs!) will be far more than just
putting all the data in a single index.
But that might just be my preferences showing
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Alexander Rosemann
wrote:
Many thanks for the tips, Erick! I do close each searcher after a search...
I will change that first
ot committed).
Hope this helps,
Shai
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Alexander Rosemann<
alexander.rosem...@gmail.com> wrote:
Many thanks for the tips, Erick! I do close each searcher after a search...
I will change that first thing tmrw. and let you know how that went.
Multi-threaded s
/at all).
You haven't said how big these indexes are nor how many
documents you're talking about here, so this advice is suspect.
Do look at putting it all in one index though, let us know if you
have some data indicating how big stuff is/would be.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:
Hi all, I was wondering whether you could give me some advice on how to
improve my search performance.
I have 90 lucene indexes, each having different fields (~5 per
Document). When I search, I always have to go through all indexes to
build my result set. Searching one index takes approx. 100m
