on.
Yours sincerely,
Adam Hornáček
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
Correction. The three facet fields used to initialize the
TermGroupFacetCollectors are SortedDVs - not SortedNumericDVs.
On 07/06/2015 04:56 PM, Adam Rosenwald wrote:
Hello all,
When using Lucene 5.X's group facet collectors (i.e.
*AbstractGroupFacetCollector* and the provided con
Hello all,
When using Lucene 5.X's group facet collectors (i.e.
*AbstractGroupFacetCollector* and the provided concrete implementation,
*TermGroupFacetCollector*), I repeatedly encounter OOM errors after
running a few search requests on an unsharded index consisting of a few
million docum
Thanks, Simon. You've obviously seen (and fixed!) the issue already, but for
the record: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4878
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 9:28 AM
To: java
t;http://labkey.org/study/xml"; without the
quotes). I'd like to either turn off regex parsing altogether or detect the
syntax error at parse time so I can provide my standard syntax guidance back
to the user.
Thanks,
Adam
"java-user"
instead of "solr-user."
Thanks,
Adam
Yes, that would solve my question 2. I can convert all umlauts to 'ue', 'ae',
etc form before the tokens get to other filters and it should work fine.
Thanks,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Igal @ getRailo.org [mailto:i...@getrailo.org]
Sent: 19 listopada 2012
output[outputPos++] = 'a';
> break;
>
> for the characters you want to replace.
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Lutz Fechner
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dyga, Adam [mailto:adam.d...@beumergroup.com]
> Sent: Montag, 19. Nove
Hello,
I have two questin regarding handling German umlauts in Lucene:
1. I'm trying to find a way to convert German Umlauts written as 'ue', 'ae',
etc to folded form 'u', 'a' and so on.
This is done by GermanAnalyzer (and German2StemFilter used by it), but
unfortunately it also does stemming w
What has this to do with Lucene? You're thinking its index would be faster than
your own search algorithm. Would it though? Do you really need an index or a
good pattern matcher? I can't see what the stream buffer being flushed by the
user has to do with it? Don't you have to control that behavi
This is interesting. What are we driving at here? A single user? That doesn't
make sense to unless you want to flag certain things as they construct the
document. Or else why don't they know what is in their own document? There must
be other ways apart from Lucene. It seems to me you want each l
Sounds like your path is messed up and you're not using maven correctly. Start
with the jar version that contains the class you require and use maven pom to
correctly resolve dependencies
Adam
Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange
-Original Message-
From: manjula wijewickrema
Date
.
>
> Since you're massaging the sort however you want,
> negative votes should be do-able.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On 9/5/07, Adam Ruggles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well a sort would remove the relevance portion of the query, whic
about boosting the relevant
> parts of the document at *index* time based on the value
> of vote
>
> Erick
>
> On 9/5/07, Adam Ruggles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to find a query that would boost a document based on a field
>>
I'm trying to find a query that would boost a document based on a field in
the document.
I have a simple index with title, description, date, ... I also have a field
called vote. I want items that have been voted higher to be ranked as
higher in the search results. Is there a query and or filte
Hello,
I saw that Doug Cutting had an interesting solution for his Technorati website:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg12709.html
It sounds like it's a single-writer, many readers type of system, but quite
robust and efficient.
Cheers,
ough there shouldn't be a problem.
Thoughts? I'm curious if this solution reflects a misunderstanding about the
way Lucene works.
Thanks,
Adam
> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:11:33 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: java-user@lucen
x27;s about the limit.
Thanks,
Adam
> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:58:43 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MultiFieldQueryParser doesn't properly filter out documents when
> the query st
days and a big Thank You to the active list users,
Adam Fleming
_
Try amazing new 3D maps
http://maps.live.com/?wip=51
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
would give the above record when it wasn't in context. This is the reason for
wanting results in order to stop these incorrect results.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
R
Adam
_
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail
-- Forwarded message --
From: Adam Saeed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jun 14, 2006 2:39 PM
Subject: create index through db for System Admin
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
How could we create index through database, in lucene as a System Admin
point of view, using PHP,
How could we create index through database, in lucene as a System Admin
point of view, using PHP, MYSQL?
Thanks
Adam
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How could we create index through database, in lucene as a System Admin
point of view?
Thanks
Adam
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, its running fine now.
Thanks again
Adam
Daniel Naber wrote:
On Montag 05 Juni 2006 19:16, Adam Saeed wrote:
Generated servlet error:
The method parse(String) in the type QueryParser is not applicable for
the arguments (String, String, Analyzer)
There's a bug in that
Can some body help me to integrate without coding all the stuff ; lucene
with mysql.
is there any startup document for a Newbie Java person for lucene with
mysql?
Thanks
Adam
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Generated servlet error:
The method parse(String) in the type QueryParser is not applicable for the
arguments (String, String, Analyzer)
I am not a java guy, i modified the QueryParser object at result.jsp, but not
get the result.
Thanks
Adam
Patrick Kimber wrote:
Hi Adam
We are getting the same error. Did you manage to work out what was
causing the problem?
Thanks
Patrick
I can't say anything definitive about this, but I think it was due to a
corrupted index; on the hunch that the index creation/update threads
were rel
This is a puzzler, I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong or whether
I have a poisoned document, a corrupted index (failing to close my
IndexModifier properly?) or what. The setup is this: I have two
processes (the backend and frontend of a CMS) that run in two different
VMs -- both use Luc
28 matches
Mail list logo
