a FilterAtomicReader subclass to do this.
Or, you can disable norms for these fields (e.g. add a single doc that
has all these fields w/ norms disabled) and then do a force merge and
it will "spread" to the merged segment.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Sep
d, or at
least disable norms (takes 1 byte per doc per indexed field regardless
of whether that doc had indexed that field), or increase HEAP to the
JVM.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 4:25 AM, 308181687 <308181...@qq.com> wrote:
> Hi, all
>we
of whether that doc had indexed that field), or increase HEAP to the
JVM.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 4:25 AM, 308181687 <308181...@qq.com> wrote:
> Hi, all
>we got an OutOfMemoryError throwed by SimpleMergedSegmentWarmer. We use
&g
Hi, all
we got an OutOfMemoryError throwed by SimpleMergedSegmentWarmer. We use
lucene 4.7， and access index file by NRTCachingDirectory/MMapDirectory. Could
any body give me a hand? Strack trace is as follows:
org.apache.lucene.index.MergePolicy$MergeException: java.lang.OutOfMemoryEr
artly mapped because the
> optimization only starts to kick in after 10,000 method calls (the default
> threshold in the JVM).Uwe-Uwe SchindlerH.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213
> Bremenhttp://www.thetaphi.deeMail: u...@thetaphi.de> -Original
> Message-> From: wangzhijiang999
>
Hi, Zhiiang
It seems that the jvm is smart enough to ignore the unused code. Try the
following code:
RandomAccessFile raf = new RandomAccessFile(new
File("/root/xx.txt"), "r");
FileChannel rafc = raf.getChannel();
ByteBuffer buff = rafc.map(Fi
Hi,
Thank you very much for your reply!
After analysis of the heap dump file, i found that there is a RAMFile
instance whose size is up to 1,670,583,296. I have limit the maxCachedMB to
60M, why NRTCachingDirectory decide to cache a big file? Obviously this file
were produced by me
"<308181...@qq.com>;
Subject: Re:RE: About lucene memory consumption
Could it be that you forgot to close older IndexReaders after getting a new NRT
one? This would be a huge memory leak.
I recommend to use SearcherManager to handle real time reopen correctly.
Uwe
Am 27. Juni 201
quot;<308181...@qq.com>;
Subject: Re:RE: About lucene memory consumption
Could it be that you forgot to close older IndexReaders after getting a new NRT
one? This would be a huge memory leak.
I recommend to use SearcherManager to handle real time reopen correctly.
Uwe
Am 27. Juni 2014
te your index to it (and use MMapDirectory
to access it).
To help you, give more information on how you use Lucene and its directory
implementations.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message
Hi, all
I fould that the memory consumption of my lucene server is abnormal, and
“jmap -histo ${pid}” show that the class of byte[] consume almost all of the
memory. Is there memory leak in my app? Why so many byte[] instances?
The following is the top output of jmap:
num
Because of stupid bug in your app. I have tested your code, it work fine:
title:?? title:?? title: title:6500 title:?? title: title:
title: title:?? title:?? title: title:??
-- --
??: "Cheng";;
: 2014??5??10??(?
Why not add an LongField to store the real id, and retrieve it directly by
Document.get('real id field name').
lubin
-- Original --
From: "Sven Teichmann";;
Date: Tue, May 6, 2014 04:33 PM
To: "java-user";
Subject: Best practice to map Lucene docids to re
Hi, Mike. Instead of periodically reopen NRT reader , I open/close it for
every search query , will this result in performance issue?
Thanks
lubin
-- --
??: "Michael McCandless";;
: 2014??5??4??(??) 1:43
??: "Lucene Users";
14 matches
Mail list logo
