Hi Michael,
The index that had an issue when merging into one segment definitely had
more than 1 billion times the word "positional" in it. I hope to be able
to give a closer number once re-indexing finished with a "work-around".
Of course the "work-around" is to just fix this correctly by not
I think we should at least open an issue to try to improve the exception
message? We might catch the exception higher up (where we know the field
name) and rethrow with the field name, maybe. We can discuss options on
the issue ...
If you are not using custom term frequencies it's not clear to m
