thanks, will try to get started asap :-)
Am 26.03.24 um 15:37 schrieb Adrien Grand:
GitHub issue or PR directly, whatever works best for you is going to work
for us.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:12 PM Michael Wechner
wrote:
Hi Adrien
Cool, thanks for your quick feedback!
Yes, IIUC it should n
GitHub issue or PR directly, whatever works best for you is going to work
for us.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:12 PM Michael Wechner
wrote:
> Hi Adrien
>
> Cool, thanks for your quick feedback!
>
> Yes, IIUC it should not be too difficult.
>
> Should I create github issue to discuss in more detail
Hi Adrien
Cool, thanks for your quick feedback!
Yes, IIUC it should not be too difficult.
Should I create github issue to discuss in more detail
https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues
Thanks
Michael
Am 26.03.24 um 14:56 schrieb Adrien Grand:
Hey Michael,
I agree that it would be a nice a
Hey Michael,
I agree that it would be a nice addition. Plus it should be pretty easy to
implement. This sounds like a good fit for a utility method on the TopDocs
class?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 2:54 PM Michael Wechner
wrote:
> Hi
>
> IIUC Lucene does not contain a RRF implementation, for exampl
Hi
IIUC Lucene does not contain a RRF implementation, for example to merge
keyword/BM25 and vector search results, right?
I think it would be nice to have within Lucene, WDYT?
Thanks
Michael
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-u
