Great, 8.11 has gone further.
Thanks Mike
Best regards
From: Mike Drob
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 5:18 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Baris Kazar
Subject: Re: Using Lucene 8.5.1 vs 8.5.2
I would use 8.5.2 if possible when considering fuzzy queries. The
I would use 8.5.2 if possible when considering fuzzy queries. The
automation can be very large, but if you’re not caching the query then the
extra footprint is not significant since it needs to be computed at some
point anyway to evaluate the query.
Really though, I would use 8.11 over either of
Dear Folks,-
I see that Lucene has changed one of the JAR files' name to
lucene-analysis-common-9.1.0.jar in Lucene version 9.1.0.
It used to use analyzers. Can someone please confirm?
Best regards
Great, this was very helpful.
This gives rough idea using the dates of the Lucene bugs/features added on
those graphs.
Best regards
From: Michael Sokolov
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 3:55 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Baris Kazar
Subject: Re: Performanc
https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/ shows how various
benchmarks have evolved over time *on the main branch*. There is no
direct comparison of every version against every other version that I
have seen though.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 2:12 PM Baris Kazar wrote:
>
> Dear Folks,-
> Sim
Dear Folks,-
Similar question to my previous post: this time I wonder if there is a Lucene
web site where benchmarks are run against these two versions of Lucene.
I see many (44+16) api changes and (48+9) improvements and (16+15) Bug fixes,
which sounds great.
Best regards
Dear Folks,-
May I please ask if using 8.5.1 is ok wrt 8.5.2?
The only change was the following where fuzzy query was fixed for a major bug
(?).
How much does this affect the fuzzy query performance? Has Dev Team done a
study to compare Lucene-9350 Bug vs Lucene-9068 Bug?
https://lucene.apache.o