Ah. That makes sense. Thanks!
(I might re-run on a larger index just to learn how it works in more detail)
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 1:24 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> 100,000+ requests per core per second is a lot. :) My initial reaction is
> that the query is likely so fast on that index that the bo
100,000+ requests per core per second is a lot. :) My initial reaction is
that the query is likely so fast on that index that the bottleneck might be
rewriting or the initialization of weights/scorers (which don't get more
costly as the index gets larger) rather than actual query execution, which
m
I reduced the benchmark as far as I could, and now got these results,
TermsInSet being a lot slower compared to the Terms/SHOULD.
BenchmarkOrQuery.benchmarkTerms thrpt5 190820.510 ± 16667.411 ops/s
BenchmarkOrQuery.benchmarkTermsInSet thrpt5 110548.345 ± 7490.169 ops/s
@Fork
Hello Adrien,
Thanks for the swift reply. I'll add the details:
Lucene version: 8.6.2
The restrictionQuery is indeed a conjunction, it allowes for a document to
be a hit if the 'roles' field is empty as well. It's used within a
bigger query builder; so maybe I did something else wrong. I'll rewr
Can you give us a few more details:
- What version of Lucene are you testing?
- Are you benchmarking "restrictionQuery" on its own, or its conjunction
with another query?
You mentioned that you combine your "restrictionQuery" and the user query
with Occur.MUST, Occur.FILTER feels more appropriat
I studied the Las Vegas patch and got one simple thought.
FirstPassingGroupCollector collects CollectedSearchGroup inside itself.
CollectedSearchGroup contains docId and sortValues. This is exactly what I
need. Thanks for the help!
пн, 12 окт. 2020 г. в 17:38, Diego Ceccarelli (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
Hello,
I'm benchmarking an application which implements security on lucene by
adding a multivalue field "roles". If the user has one of these roles, he
can find the document.
I implemented this as a Boolean and query, added the original query and the
restriction with Occur.MUST.
I'm having some
