Re: CheckIndex complaining about -1 for norms value

2020-06-11 Thread Adrien Grand
+1 On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:27 PM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Maybe we should fix CheckIndex to print norms as unsigned integers? > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:00 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > To my knowledge,

Re: CheckIndex complaining about -1 for norms value

2020-06-11 Thread Michael McCandless
Maybe we should fix CheckIndex to print norms as unsigned integers? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:00 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > To my knowledge, -1 always represented the maximum supported length, both > before and after 7.0 (when we changed the norms

Re: CheckIndex complaining about -1 for norms value

2020-06-11 Thread Adrien Grand
To my knowledge, -1 always represented the maximum supported length, both before and after 7.0 (when we changed the norms encoding). One thing that changed when we introduced sparse norms is that documents with no value moved from having 0 as a norm to not having a norm at all, but I don't see how