Re: [External] Re: How to ignore certain words based on query specifics

2019-07-11 Thread Shifflett, David [USA]
Evert, It is definitely not a bug. I was asking about how to do something, I couldn't quite figure out. Stop words is the way to go. David Shifflett On 7/11/19, 11:26 AM, "evert.wagenaar" wrote: I see it as a feature, not a bug. The appearance of stop words in the Search Summary makes i

Re: [External] Re: How to ignore certain words based on query specifics

2019-07-11 Thread evert.wagenaar
I see it as a feature, not a bug. The appearance of stop words in the Search Summary makes it more clear what the Hit is about.Not sure but I think Google does the same in search summaries.-Evert(http://www.ejwagenaar.com) Original message From: "Shifflett, David [USA]" Date: 7

Re: Lucene Index Cloud Replication

2019-07-11 Thread Anton Zenkov
Another +1. We are also big s3 + lucene users and it is very interesting what other people came up with. We have an S3 lucene directory that allows immediate read-only use of lucene indexes stored on s3 with simultaneous local caching and a prototype of segment based index replication based on the

Re: Impact and WAND

2019-07-11 Thread Atri Sharma
Note that any other scoring mode (COMPLETE or COMPLETE_NO_SCORES) will mandatorily visit all hits, so there is no scope of skipping and hence no point of using impacts. On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 8:51 AM Wu,Yunfeng wrote: > > > @Adrien Grand mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>>. Thanks for your > reply. > >

Re: [External] Re: How to ignore certain words based on query specifics

2019-07-11 Thread Shifflett, David [USA]
I just tested this with the search.highight.Highlighter class. Is this the 'old default highlighter'? I phrased my question badly. Of course the stop words shouldn't be highlighted, as they wouldn't match any query. My question was really, would the stop words be available for inclusion in the hi