Re: StanardFilter Question : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8356

2019-06-24 Thread Trejkaz
I did the research on this one because it confused me as well, but it seems it was a no-op. So the replacement is just to remove it from the filter chain. We have a backwards compatibility filter factory, so we deal with it by keeping around a compatibility implementation which just does nothing l

StanardFilter Question : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8356

2019-06-24 Thread baris . kazar
According to this jira ticket, where else is StandardFilter included in Lucene 8.1.1? and why is it a no-op now in Lucene 8.1.1? I wish the tickets were a bit more explicit and suggest what to use instead for deprecated versions like in version 7.5.0 or why it became no-op in version 8.1.1?

Re: A possible Java exception message fix

2019-06-24 Thread baris . kazar
Thsi exception message: This version of Lucene only supports indexes created with release 6.0 and later. needs to change to  This version of Lucene only supports indexes created with release 7.0 and later. Thanks On 6/24/19 4:30 PM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote: I already explained on t

Re: A possible Java exception message fix

2019-06-24 Thread baris . kazar
I already explained on the message line and in the email body: the exception message needs a fix and i explained in detail below. Thanks On 6/24/19 2:06 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: What are you asking here? Indeed, Lucene 8 (and therefore Solr) will not open an index that has ever been touched by

Re: A possible Java exception message fix

2019-06-24 Thread Erick Erickson
What are you asking here? Indeed, Lucene 8 (and therefore Solr) will not open an index that has ever been touched by Lucene 6x or earlier. You must re-index into 8x. You cannot spoof this with, for instance, IndexUpgraderTool and go from 6->7->8. You must reindex from your system-of-record. Th

Re: A possible Java exception message fix

2019-06-24 Thread baris . kazar
Ok i forgot to mention below that i was trying to run 6.6. index with Lucene 8.1.1. Best regards On 6/24/19 2:03 PM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote: Index created with Lucene 6.6 and*i tried running the same index with Lucene 8.1 *and according to that,  this error message might need update:

A possible Java exception message fix

2019-06-24 Thread baris . kazar
Index created with Lucene 6.6 and according to that,  this error message might need update:-> This version of Lucene only supports indexes created with release 7.0 and later. The first part of the error message is consistent with the error: -> 6 (needs to be between 7 and 9). Hope this helps

Re: Incremental Lucene Index

2019-06-24 Thread Atri Sharma
Yes, Lucene supports incremental indexing. Note that the underlying structure is append only, so you are still paying the cost of delete + insert, but the semantics are what you expect them to be. On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 7:18 PM, Sukhendu Kumar Biswal wrote: > Hi Team, > Does Lucene support incre

Incremental Lucene Index

2019-06-24 Thread Sukhendu Kumar Biswal
Hi Team, Does Lucene support incremental indexing or we need to index complete repository for every update in the database? We have a scenario where millions of records are stored in RDMS and which gets updated once in a day. Details: First time we created indexes for millions of records ,if some