Re: Lucene 6.1.0 index upgrade

2017-11-10 Thread Trejkaz
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Krishnamurthy, Kannan wrote: > Never mind my previous question, understood what you meant about the impact > to norms after > looking at the uses of CreatedMajorVersion in various Similarity classes. It > almost looks > re-indexing is the only option here. This w

Re: Lucene config issue cannot run demo

2017-11-10 Thread Steve Rowe
Hi Mike, Just above the line you give, there is a discussion of “setting up your Java CLASSPATH” - you need to do this first. Assuming you’re on Windows (because your email includes “Sent from Mail for Windows 10”), you’ll need to do something like the following before invoking the java comman

Lucene config issue cannot run demo

2017-11-10 Thread Mike Lynott
The Lucene demo calls for file that’s not provided. On this page: http://lucene.apache.org/core/7_1_0/demo/overview-summary.html#overview_description we are told to run this command: java org.apache.lucene.demo.IndexFiles -docs {path-to-lucene} Error message received: Error: Could not find or

Re: Lucene 6.1.0 index upgrade

2017-11-10 Thread Krishnamurthy, Kannan
Never mind my previous question, understood what you meant about the impact to norms after looking at the uses of CreatedMajorVersion in various Similarity classes. It almost looks re-indexing is the only option here. This will be quite a big change to embrace for the users of addIndexes(). ( M

Re: Lucene 6.1.0 index upgrade

2017-11-10 Thread Krishnamurthy, Kannan
Will the norms still be a concern if the 6.1.0 index was upgraded using the IndexUpgrader? If not would we upgrade first then fake the index creation version to be 7.0.0 ? Thanks again. Kannan From: Michael McCandless Date: Friday, November 10, 2017 at 6:41 AM To: Lucene Users , "Krishnamurthy,

strange performance diff

2017-11-10 Thread Yonghui Zhao
Hi, I use the code below to test same query on same index in one time. long t0 = System.currentTimeMillis(); indexSearcher.search(query, from + size); long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis(); LOGGER.info("indexSearcher.search(query, from + size) took:" + (t1 - t0) + "ms"); TopScoreDocCollector coll

Re: Lucene 6.1.0 index upgrade

2017-11-10 Thread Michael McCandless
OK I'm sorry but I think you'll have to re-index; e.g. how norms are computed and stored in the index has changed, which means even if you could somehow copy or merge the index over to the new version, the norms would be incorrect. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Nov 9, 20