RE: CustomAnalyzer.Builder builder()

2017-03-29 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, the resources must be setup inside the JAR file in the same way like in classpath of your IDE. As you did not give any examples and also removed the resource name from your stack trace so we cannot figure out what you are doing! The default builder uses the context classloader of current th

RE: Adding TokenFilters to a CustomAnalyzer is too inflexible

2017-03-29 Thread Uwe Schindler
A TokenFilter object already build won't work, because the Analyzer must create new instances of the TokenFilters as needed. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Nicolás Lichtmaier [mailto:nicol

CustomAnalyzer.Builder builder()

2017-03-29 Thread Leonardo Pérez Pulido
Hi, The documentation for the CustomAnalyzer Analyzer is very specific, one can create an instance of a custom analyzer in three different ways. Using the default CustomAnalizer.builder(...), is supposed to load all resources from the classpath, and it works ok inside the IDE. But when I depl

Re: Text search from List of xml files using Apache Lucene

2017-03-29 Thread Evert Wagenaar
You don't need a Lucene Parser (They don't exist). In stead use a Java Parser (such as dom4j). I personally prefer DOM. It allows XPATH to extract exactly what you need. SAX is an alternative to DOM. SAX isn't however recommended by the W3C and lacks many of the extraction methods available in DOM.

Adding TokenFilters to a CustomAnalyzer is too inflexible

2017-03-29 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
I'm using a CustomAnalyzer.Builder to set up an analyzer. I now would like to add synonym processing, I already have the SynonymMap in memory. But the builder interface only takes String arguments. Wouldn't it be a good thing to add a method to CustomAnalyzer.Builder to add a TokenFilter object

Re: 5.x to 6.x migration: replacement for Lucene50Codec

2017-03-29 Thread Adrien Grand
If you move to Lucene 6.1, then this should be Lucene60Codec. More generally that would be the same codec that is returned by Codec.getDefault. Le mer. 29 mars 2017 à 18:11, Andreas Sewe a écrit : > Hi, > > I am currently attempting a Lucene 5.x to 6.x migration (from 5.2.1 to > 6.1, to be preci

5.x to 6.x migration: replacement for Lucene50Codec

2017-03-29 Thread Andreas Sewe
Hi, I am currently attempting a Lucene 5.x to 6.x migration (from 5.2.1 to 6.1, to be precise), and am looking for a replacement for Lucene50Codec: indexWriterConfig.setCodec(new Lucene50Codec(Mode.BEST_COMPRESSION)); The org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50 package is still there, so what I am a

Index error

2017-03-29 Thread Jenny
Dear All, I am writing an index for my project. Basically, I need to index documents that have the following string parts (s1=uri1, s2=url1##sameAs.org service@@url2##source KG owl:sameas@@). To do so, I am using the following code: TO ADD: String urlString="subA" String tmp = "url1##sameAs.