Hi,
For sorting you should add the fields as DocValues type in addition to indexed
fields (if you also query on them). That ist the problem. But for that you
should update your Lucene version.
For that reason Lucene 6 no longer has FieldCache, which emulates DocValues
loading everything to hea
And I frequently forget which list I'm on. Siiigggh...
Listen to Mike ;)
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Kumaran Ramasubramanian
wrote:
> Thanks Erick and Mike. i am using lucene 4.10.4 directly.
>
>
> i have observed better performance in LongField compared to lexicographic
> sort
Hi,
This is the index we are using:
Number of fields: 355.
Number of documents: 225 thousand.
Number of terms: 5522 thousand.
The index size is around 800MB.
TermInfos index divisor: 1
Index format: Lucene 4.0.
We are getting Java OutOfMemory error with searches. We are using a heap
size of 1
I don't know anything about JBoss but I am pretty sure this is something
that can be configured. A quick Google search suggests the default thread
pool size is 512 * number_of_processors, which is indeed likely too high
for Lucene: https://developer.jboss.org/thread/267570. Looks like it can be
con
Thanks Adrien for quick reply!
We use jboss app server to handle application level threads.
Thanks,
Mukul Ranjan
From: Adrien Grand [mailto:jpou...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 6:33 PM
To: Mukul Ranjan ; Lucene Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: CompressingStoredFieldReader object t
Hi,
SearcherManager only cares about managing readers/searchers in a
thread-safe way, it does not know about the thread pool it runs in.
How does your application handle threads? I'm thinking you might be running
in a servlet container, or a similar framework that handles it for you?
Le ven. 23
Thanks Erick and Mike. i am using lucene 4.10.4 directly.
i have observed better performance in LongField compared to lexicographic
sorting. i can understand, it is due to trie structure of LongField,
But one more doubt, Will uninversion process happen in IntField / LongField
too?
Thanks for th
Note that Erick is giving you the Solr syntax below, but if you are
using Lucene directly, that obviously doesn't apply (though the same
general concepts do).
I would strongly recommend not using uninversion: it's an archaic and
costly option that Lucene only offered long ago because it didn't hav
