The explanation makes sense, I think you're right. Even though I don't
think this optimization would be used often, it would certainly help
performance when it is used.
Le sam. 13 août 2016 à 12:21, Spyros Kapnissis a
écrit :
> Ok, I had some time to look a bit further into it. It seems that ind
Ok, I had some time to look a bit further into it. It seems that indeed a
SHOULD clause with FILTER is equivalent with an AND clause with a
minShouldMatch of -1 in terms of both the number of results and score.
My reasoning goes like this:
given:- a single clause both as a SHOULD and a FILTER is
